LEADER 01651aam 2200433I 450 001 9910711189603321 005 20151030113009.0 024 8 $aGOVPUB-C13-1c90288e29849f83be1bbaba1dfc1e80 035 $a(CKB)5470000002480111 035 $a(OCoLC)927169899 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002480111 100 $a20151030d1989 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aManagement of networks based on open systems interconnectiion (OSI) standards /$frobert Aronoff, Michael Chernick, Karen Hsing, Kevin Mills, Daniel Stokesberry 210 1$aGaithersburg, MD :$cU.S. Dept. of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology,$d1989. 215 $a1 online resource 225 1 $aNIST special publication ;$v500-175 300 $a1989. 300 $aContributed record: Metadata reviewed, not verified. Some fields updated by batch processes. 300 $aTitle from PDF title page. 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 517 $aManagement of networks based on open systems interconnectiion 700 $aAronoff$b Robert$01389026 701 $aAronoff$b Robert$01389026 701 $aChernick$b Michael$0140081 701 $aHsing$b Karen$01405524 701 $aMills$b Kevin$01389027 701 $aStokesberry$b Daniel$01405525 712 02$aNational Institute of Standards and Technology (U.S.) 801 0$bNBS 801 1$bNBS 801 2$bGPO 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910711189603321 996 $aManagement of networks based on open systems interconnectiion (OSI) standards$93482288 997 $aUNINA LEADER 05321nam 2200817 450 001 9910827477203321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-231-50107-2 024 7 $a10.7312/mcco12616 035 $a(CKB)111056485391316 035 $a(MH)008940065-8 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000101552 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11998832 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000101552 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10042231 035 $a(PQKB)11744512 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5275834 035 $a(DE-B1597)459112 035 $a(OCoLC)51566945 035 $a(OCoLC)979953746 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780231501071 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5275834 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11529431 035 $a(EXLCZ)99111056485391316 100 $a20180403h20022002 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aAlterations of state $esacred kingship in the English Reformation /$fRichard C. McCoy 210 1$aNew York :$cColumbia University Press,$d2002. 210 4$dİ2002 215 $a1 online resource (xxiv, 218 p. )$cill. ; 300 $aIncludes index. 311 $a0-231-12616-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tPreface -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tIllustrations -- $t1. Real Presence to Royal Presence -- $t2. Sacred Space: John Skelton and Westminster's Royal Sepulcher -- $t3. Rites of Memory: Shakespeare and the Elizabethan Compromise -- $t4. Idolizing Kings: John Milton and Stuart Rule -- $t5. Sacramental to Sentimental: Andrew Marvell and the Restoration -- $tNotes -- $tIndex 330 $aTraditional notions of sacred kingship became both more grandiose and more problematic during England's turbulent sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. The reformation launched by Henry VIII and his claims for royal supremacy and divine right rule led to the suppression of the Mass, as the host and crucifix were overshadowed by royal iconography and pageantry. These changes began a religious controversy in England that would lead to civil war, regicide, restoration, and ultimately revolution. Richard McCoy shows that, amid these sometimes cataclysmic Alterations of State, writers like John Skelton, Shakespeare, John Milton, and Andrew Marvell grappled with the idea of kingship and its symbolic and substantive power. Their artistic representations of the crown reveal the passion and ambivalence with which the English viewed their royal leaders. While these writers differed on the fundamental questions of the day-Skelton was a staunch defender of the English monarchy and traditional religion, Milton was a radical opponent of both, and Shakespeare and Marvell were more equivocal-they shared an abiding fascination with the royal presence or, sometimes more tellingly, the royal absence. Ranging from regicides real and imagined-with the very real specter of the slain King Charles I haunting the country like a revenant of the king's ghost in Shakespeare's Hamlet-from the royal sepulcher at Westminster Abbey to Peter Paul Reubens's Apotheosis of King James at Whitehall, and from the Elizabethan compromise to the Glorious Revolution, McCoy plumbs the depths of English attitudes toward the king, the state, and the very idea of holiness. He reveals how older notions of sacred kingship expanded during the political and religious crises that transformed the English nation, and helps us understand why the conflicting emotions engendered by this expansion have proven so persistent. 606 $aKings and rulers$xReligious aspects$xChristianity 606 $aEnglish literature$yEarly modern, 1500-1700$xHistory and criticism 606 $aKings and rulers in literature 606 $aChristianity and literature$zGreat Britain$xHistory$y16th century 606 $aChristianity and literature$zGreat Britain$xHistory$y17th century 606 $aPolitics and literature$zGreat Britain$xHistory$y16th century 606 $aPolitics and literature$zGreat Britain$xHistory$y17th century 606 $aMonarchy in literature 606 $aHoly, The, in literature 606 $aState, The, in literature 606 $aChurch and state in literature 615 0$aKings and rulers$xReligious aspects$xChristianity. 615 0$aEnglish literature$xHistory and criticism. 615 0$aKings and rulers in literature. 615 0$aChristianity and literature$xHistory 615 0$aChristianity and literature$xHistory 615 0$aPolitics and literature$xHistory 615 0$aPolitics and literature$xHistory 615 0$aMonarchy in literature. 615 0$aHoly, The, in literature. 615 0$aState, The, in literature. 615 0$aChurch and state in literature. 676 $a820.9352351 700 $aMcCoy$b Richard C.$f1946-$01681928 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910827477203321 996 $aAlterations of state$94051675 997 $aUNINA 999 $aThis Record contains information from the Harvard Library Bibliographic Dataset, which is provided by the Harvard Library under its Bibliographic Dataset Use Terms and includes data made available by, among others the Library of Congress