LEADER 03269nam 2200589 450 001 9910827380003321 005 20231006204249.0 010 $a1-5015-0772-9 024 7 $a10.1515/9781501507786 035 $a(CKB)4100000001966068 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5156719 035 $a(DE-B1597)489108 035 $a(OCoLC)1024042254 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781501507786 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5156719 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11508852 035 $a(OCoLC)1023551066 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000001966068 100 $a20180228h20182018 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe conceptualization of counterfactuality in L1 and L2 $egrammatical devices and semantic implications in French, Spanish and Italian /$fIsabel Repiso 210 1$aMouton, [Louisiana] :$cDe Gruyter,$d2018. 210 4$dİ2018 215 $a1 online resource (164 pages) $cillustrations 225 1 $aStudies on Language Acquisition ;$vVolume 56. 311 $a1-5015-1613-2 311 $a1-5015-0778-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter --$tAcknowledgements --$tTable of contents --$tTables and figures --$tDedication --$tQuote --$tIntroduction --$t1. Counterfactuality: a theoretical overview --$t2. Expressing conditionality in French, Spanish and Italian --$t3. Acquisition of counterfactuality in L1 and L2 --$t4. Methodology --$t5. Results in L1 French, Spanish and Italian --$t6. Results in L2 French --$t7. Discussion --$tConcluding remarks --$tReferences --$tIndex 330 $aCounterfactual thinking is a universal cognitive process in which reality is compared to an imagined view of what might have been. This type of reasoning is at the center of daily operations, as decision-making, risk preventability or blame assignment. More generally, non-factual scenarios have been defined as a crucial ingredient of desire and modern love. If the areas covered by this reasoning are so varied, the L2 learner will be led to express 'what might have been' at some point of her acquisitional itinerary. How is this reasoning expressed in French, Spanish and Italian? By the use of what lexical, syntactic and grammatical devices? Will the learner combine these devices as the native French speakers do? What are the L1 features likely to fossilize in the L2 grammar? What are the information principles governing a communicative task based on the production of counterfactual scenarios? These are some of the questions addressed by the present volume. 410 0$aStudies on language acquisition ;$vVolume 56. 606 $aLanguage acquisition 606 $aLanguage acquisition$vCongresses 610 $aCounterfactuality. 610 $aDecision-Making. 610 $aIrrealis. 610 $aSecond Language Acquisition. 615 0$aLanguage acquisition. 615 0$aLanguage acquisition 676 $a401.93 700 $aRepiso$b Isabel$f1981-$01708144 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910827380003321 996 $aThe conceptualization of counterfactuality in L1 and L2$94096927 997 $aUNINA