LEADER 03351nam 2200505Ia 450 001 9910827118903321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-231-50887-5 035 $a(CKB)2560000000050751 035 $a(EBL)895087 035 $a(OCoLC)664802793 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC895087 035 $a(EXLCZ)992560000000050751 100 $a20091215d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aNaturalism and normativity /$fedited by Mario De Caro and David Macarthur 210 $aNew York $cColumbia University Press$d2010 215 $a1 online resource (378 p.) 225 1 $aColumbia themes in philosophy 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-231-13467-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aContents; Introduction: Science, Naturalism, and the Problem of Normativity; Part I: Conceptual and Historical Background; 1: The Wider Significance of Naturalism a Genealogical Essay (Akeel Bilgrami); 2: Naturalism and Quietism (Richard Rorty); 3: Is Liberal Naturalism Possible?(Mario De Caro and Alberto Voltolini); Part II: Philosophy and the Natural Sciences; 4: Science and Philosophy (Hilary Putnam); 5: Why Scientific Realism May Invite Relativism (Carol Rovane); Part III: Philosophy and the Human Sciences; 6: Taking the Human Sciences Seriously (David Macarthur) 327 $a7: Reasons and Causes Revisited (Peter Menzies)Part IV: Meta-Ethics and Normativity; 8: Metaphysics and Morals (T. M . Scanlon); 9: The Naturalist Gap in Ethics (Erin I. Kelly and Lionel K. McPherson); 10: Phenomenology and the Normativity of Practical Reason (Stephen L. White); Part V: Epistemology and Normativity; 11: Truth as Convenient Friction (Huw Price); 12: Exchange on "Truth as Convenient Friction" (Richard Rorty and Huw Price); 13: Two Directions for Analytic Kantianism Naturalism and Idealism (Paul Redding); Part VI: Naturalism and Human Nature 327 $a14: How to be Naturalistic Without Being Simplistic in the Study of Human Nature (John Dupre?)15: Dewey, Continuity, and McDowell (Peter Godfrey-Smith); 16: Wittgenstein and Naturalism (Marie McGinn); Contributors; Index 330 $aNormativity concerns what we ought to think or do and the evaluations we make. For example, we say that we ought to think consistently, we ought to keep our promises, or that Mozart is a better composer than Salieri. Yet what philosophical moral can we draw from the apparent absence of normativity in the scientific image of the world? For scientific naturalists, the moral is that the normative must be reduced to the nonnormative, while for nonnaturalists, the moral is that there must be a transcendent realm of norms. Naturalism and Normativity engages with both sides of t 410 0$aColumbia themes in philosophy. 606 $aNaturalism 606 $aNormativity (Ethics) 615 0$aNaturalism. 615 0$aNormativity (Ethics) 676 $a146 701 $aDe Caro$b Mario$0290682 701 $aMacarthur$b David$01597061 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910827118903321 996 $aNaturalism and Normativity$93918681 997 $aUNINA