LEADER 02094nam  2200445   450 
001 9910827070303321
005 20201106112329.0
010   $a0-300-25287-0
024 7 $a10.12987/9780300252873
035   $a(CKB)4100000010858680
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6151532
035   $a(DE-B1597)550920
035   $a(DE-B1597)9780300252873
035   $a(OCoLC)1148869763
035   $a(PPN)251016404
035   $a(EXLCZ)994100000010858680
100   $a20200708d2020      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aSovereignty, RIP /$fDon Herzog
210  1$aNew Haven ;$aLondon :$cYale University Press,$d[2020]
210  4$dİ2020
215   $a1 online resource (316 pages)
311   $a0-300-24772-9 
327   $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tPreface -- $t1 Sovereignty -- $t2 Limited -- $t3 Divided -- $t4 Accountable -- $t5 Remnants -- $tIndex 
330   $aHas the concept of sovereignty outlived its usefulness? Social order requires a sovereign: an actor with unlimited, undivided, and unaccountable authority. Or so the classic theory says. But without noticing, we?ve gutted the theory. Constitutionalism limits state authority. Federalism divides it. The rule of law holds it accountable. In vivid historical detail?with millions tortured and slaughtered in Europe, a king put on trial for his life, journalists groaning at idiotic complaints about the League of Nations, and much more?Don Herzog charts both the political struggles that forged sovereignty and the ones that undid it. He argues that it?s no longer a helpful guide to our legal and political problems, but a pernicious bit of confusion. It?s time, past time, to retire sovereignty.
606   $aSovereignty
615  0$aSovereignty.
676   $a320.15
700   $aHerzog$b Don$01481505
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910827070303321
996   $aSovereignty, RIP$94037599
997   $aUNINA