LEADER 03199nam  2200577   450 
001 9910826750203321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a0-7391-4082-5
035   $a(CKB)2550000001290083
035   $a(EBL)1686423
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001196084
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12396001
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001196084
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11162737
035   $a(PQKB)10120173
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1686423
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1686423
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10869286
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL605098
035   $a(OCoLC)879551375
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000001290083
100   $a20140524h20112011  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 04$aThe Rehnquist court and criminal justice /$fedited by Christopher E. Smith, Christina DeJong, and Michael A. McCall
210  1$aLanham, Maryland ;$aPlymouth, England :$cLexington Books,$d2011.
210  4$dİ2011
215   $a1 online resource (325 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-7391-4080-9 
311   $a0-7391-4081-7 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and indexes.
327   $aTHE REHNQUIST COURT AND CRIMINAL JUSTICE; Contents; Preface; 1 Introduction: The Rehnquist Court; 2 William Brennan and Thurgood Marshall: The Mediator & the Absolutist; 3 Byron White: The Overlooked, Moderate Swing Voter; 4 Harry A. Blackmun: Counterweight to a Conservative Court; 5 William H. Rehnquist: Leadership & Influence from the Conservative Wing; 6 John Paul Stevens: A Liberal Leader & His Roles on the Court; 7 Sandra Day O'Connor: Influence from the Middle of the Court; 8 Antonin Scalia: Outspoken & Influential Originalist; 9 Anthony Kennedy: Conservatism & Independence
327   $a10 David H. Souter: Unexpected Independent11 Clarence Thomas: Consistent, Conservative, & Contrarian; 12 Ruth Bader Ginsburg: Careful Defender of Individual Rights; 13 Stephen G. Breyer: Judicial Modesty & Pragmatic Solutions; Case Index; Subject Index; About the Contributors
330   $aBy analyzing the perspectives and influential decisions of individual justices on the Rehnquist Court (1986-2005), this volume reveals how a divided Supreme Court limited the scope of rights affecting criminal justice without fulfilling conservatives' goal of eliminating foundational concepts established during the Warren Court era. The era's generally conservative Supreme Court preserved rights in several contexts because individual justices do not necessarily view all constitutional rights issues through a simple, consistent philosophical 
606   $aCriminal justice, Administration of$zUnited States$vCases
615  0$aCriminal justice, Administration of
676   $a347.73/2609
702   $aSmith$b Christopher E.
702   $aDeJong$b Christina$f1967-
702   $aMcCall$b Michael A.$f1965-
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910826750203321
996   $aThe Rehnquist court and criminal justice$93942856
997   $aUNINA