LEADER 03392nam  2200589Ia 450 
001 9910826601603321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a90-04-24644-4
024 7 $a10.1163/9789004246447
035   $a(CKB)2670000000353904
035   $a(EBL)1173091
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000872027
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11471598
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000872027
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10830997
035   $a(PQKB)10309046
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1173091
035   $a(OCoLC)843636887
035   $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004246447
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1173091
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10689451
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL478896
035   $a(PPN)174400020
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000353904
100   $a20130129d2013      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 14$aThe pilot-judgement procedure of the European Court of Human Rights$b[electronic resource] /$fby Dominik Haider
210   $aLeiden ;$aBoston $cBrill$d2013
215   $a1 online resource (347 p.)
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a90-04-24641-X 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aPreliminary Material -- The Overload of the Strasbourg System -- The Steps of Examination to be Conducted -- Overview -- Judicial Development Leading to Pilot Judgments -- Political Context and Development -- Conclusion -- Overview -- Definitions -- The Elements of the Pilot-Judgment Procedure -- Conclusion -- Overview -- Obligation to Implement the Convention -- Obligation to Abide by Judgments of the Court -- Pilot Judgments: A New Approach to Redress? -- Overview -- Pilot Judgments and the Individual Complaints Procedure -- Determination of Remedial Measures -- Assessment of General Measures in Friendly Settlement Judgments -- Adjournment and Striking Out of Applications -- Conclusion -- Pilot Judgments -- Index of Case-Law -- List of Literature -- List of Council of Europe-Documents -- Index.
330   $aStructural human rights deficiencies in the member states of the European Convention of Human Rights have caused numerous individual applications to the European Court of Human Rights and are a considerable factor in the Court's persistent overload crisis. The Pilot-Judgment Procedure was devised to tackle these structural deficiencies and has become an important instrument of the Court. Dominik Haider examines to which extent the Pilot-Judgment Procedure is reconcilable with the European Convention on Human Rights. After an analysis of the member states? obligations to resolve structural deficiencies, the author asks if the European Court of Human Rights is empowered to take the procedural steps which are characteristic of the Pilot-Judgment Procedure. In particular, the Court's express orders are critically scrutinised.
606   $aCivil procedure$zEurope
606   $aHuman rights$zEurope
610   $aTest cases
615  0$aCivil procedure
615  0$aHuman rights
676   $a342.2408/50269
700   $aHaider$b Dominik$01666642
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910826601603321
996   $aThe pilot-judgement procedure of the European Court of Human Rights$94026003
997   $aUNINA