LEADER 04406nam 2200733 450 001 9910826535903321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-5017-4848-3 010 $a0-8014-5636-3 024 7 $a10.7591/9780801456367 035 $a(CKB)3710000000462624 035 $a(EBL)3425982 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001544308 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16135217 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001544308 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)13510378 035 $a(PQKB)11660477 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001516675 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3425982 035 $a(OCoLC)1080551374 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse58473 035 $a(DE-B1597)478669 035 $a(OCoLC)918150575 035 $a(OCoLC)920784314 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780801456367 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3425982 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11084141 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL821875 035 $a(OCoLC)935243040 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000462624 100 $a20150814h20152015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 14$aThe fascist effect $eJapan and Italy, 1915-1952 /$fReto Hofmann 210 1$aIthaca, New York ;$aLondon, [England] :$cCornell University Press,$d2015. 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (219 p.) 225 1 $aStudies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8014-5635-5 311 $a0-8014-5341-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFront matter --$tContents --$tAcknowledgments --$tIntroduction --$t1. Mediator of Fascism: Shimoi Harukichi, 1915-1928 --$t2. The Mussolini Boom, 1928-1931 --$t3. The Clash of Fascisms, 1931-1937 --$t4. Imperial Convergence: The Italo- Ethiopian War and Japanese World- Order Thinking, 1935-1936 --$t5. Fascism in World History, 1937-1943 --$tEpilogue: Fascism after the New World Order, 1943-1952 --$tNotes --$tBibliography --$tIndex 330 $aDuring the interwar period, Japanese intellectuals, writers, activists, and politicians, although conscious of the many points of intersection between their politics and those of Mussolini, were ambivalent about the comparability of Imperial Japan and Fascist Italy. In The Fascist Effect, Reto Hofmann uncovers the ideological links that tied Japan to Italy, drawing on extensive materials from Japanese and Italian archives to shed light on the formation of fascist history and practice in Japan and beyond. Moving between personal experiences, diplomatic and cultural relations, and geopolitical considerations, Hofmann shows that interwar Japan found in fascism a resource to develop a new order at a time of capitalist crisis. Japanese thinkers and politicians debated fascism as part of a wider effort to overcome a range of modern woes, including class conflict and moral degeneration, through measures that fostered national cohesion and social order. Hofmann demonstrates that fascism in Japan was neither a European import nor a domestic product; it was, rather, the result of a complex process of global transmission and reformulation. By focusing on how interwar Japanese understood fascism, Hofmann recuperates a historical debate that has been largely disregarded by historians, even though its extent reveals that fascism occupied a central position in the politics of interwar Japan. Far from being a vague term, as postwar historiography has so often claimed, for Japanese of all backgrounds who came of age from the 1920's to the 1940's, fascism conjured up a set of concrete associations, including nationalism, leadership, economics, and a drive toward empire and a new world order. 410 0$aStudies of the Weatherhead East Asian Institute, Columbia University. 606 $aFascism$zJapan$xHistory 606 $aFascism$zItaly$xHistory 607 $aJapan$xRelations$zItaly 607 $aItaly$xRelations$zJapan 610 $aFascism, Japan, Transnational, ultra-nationalism, Mussolini. 615 0$aFascism$xHistory. 615 0$aFascism$xHistory. 676 $a327.5204509/04 700 $aHofmann$b Reto$f1975-$01594589 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910826535903321 996 $aThe fascist effect$93915166 997 $aUNINA