LEADER 04003nam 2200505 a 450 001 9910826403003321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-19-976949-4 010 $a1-281-34686-1 035 $a(CKB)1000000000029070 035 $a(EBL)3051863 035 $a(OCoLC)922952480 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3051863 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000029070 100 $a20030430d2003 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAffirmative action and racial preference $ea debate /$fCarl Cohen, James P. Sterba 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aOxford [England] ;$aNew York $cOxford University Press$d2003 215 $a1 online resource (411 p.) 225 1 $aPoint/counterpoint series 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-19-514895-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 365-370) and index. 327 $a""Contents""; ""Preface One""; ""Preface Two""; ""Cases""; ""SECTION ONE: WHY RACE PREFERENCE IS WRONG AND BAD""; ""Prologue: Wrongness and Badness""; ""PART I: EQUALITY AND RACE PREFERENCE""; ""1 Equality as a Moral Ideal""; ""2 Affirmative Action""; ""3 Race Preference: The Transformation of Affirmative Action""; ""PART II: WHY RACE PREFERENCE IS WRONG""; ""4 Race Preference Is Morally Wrong""; ""5 Race Preference Is Against the Law""; ""6 Race Preference Violates the Constitution""; ""PART III: WHY RACE PREFERENCE IS BAD""; ""7 Race Preference Is Bad for the Minorities Preferred"" 327 $a""8 Race Preference Is Bad for the Universities that Give Preference""""9 Race Preference Is Bad for Society as a Whole""; ""Epilogue: The Future of Race Preference""; ""SECTION TWO: DEFENDING AFFIRMATIVE ACTION, DEFENDING PREFERENCES""; ""1 A Legal History of Affirmative Action in the United States""; ""2 A Definition of Affirmative Action""; ""3 A Defense of Outreach Affirmative Action""; ""4 A Defense of Remedial Affirmative Action""; ""5 Remedial Affirmative Action and the U.S. Supreme Court""; ""6 Racial Discrimination v. Sexual Discrimination"" 327 $a""7 A Better Standard of Proof for Remedial Affirmative Action""""8 A Defense of Diversity Affirmative Action""; ""9 Objections to Affirmative Action""; ""10 Affirmative Action outside the United States""; ""Conclusion""; ""SECTION THREE: REPLY TO JAMES P. STERBA""; ""SECTION FOUR: REPLY TO CARL COHEN""; ""SECTION FIVE: COMMENTS ON THE SUPREME COURT DECISION""; ""Bibliography""; ""Index""; ""A""; ""B""; ""C""; ""D""; ""E""; ""F""; ""G""; ""H""; ""I""; ""J""; ""K""; ""L""; ""M""; ""N""; ""O""; ""P""; ""Q""; ""R""; ""S""; ""T""; ""U""; ""V""; ""W""; ""X""; ""Y"" 330 $aRacial preferences are among the most contentious issues in our society, touching on fundamental questions of fairness and the proper role of racial categories in government action. In this volume, two contemporary philosophers, in a lively debate, lay out the arguments on each side. Carl Cohen, a key figure in the University of Michigan Supreme Court cases, argues that racial preferences are morally wrong--forbidden by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, and explicitly banned by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. James P. Sterba counters that, far from being banned by the Constitution and the civil rights acts, affirmative action is actually mandated by law in the pursuit of a society that is racially and sexually just. 410 0$aPoint/counterpoint series (Oxford, England) 606 $aAffirmative action programs$xLaw and legislation$zUnited States 615 0$aAffirmative action programs$xLaw and legislation 676 $a342.73/087 700 $aCohen$b Carl$f1931-$0237095 701 $aSterba$b James P$0515156 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910826403003321 996 $aAffirmative action and racial preference$91431749 997 $aUNINA