LEADER 03504nam  2200613Ia 450 
001 9910826371003321
005 20240513084626.0
010   $a1-282-15465-6
010   $a9786612154652
010   $a90-272-9253-1
035   $a(CKB)1000000000535138
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000270538
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11253669
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000270538
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10262142
035   $a(PQKB)11661323
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC623284
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL623284
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10176628
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL215465
035   $a(OCoLC)233636505
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000535138
100   $a20070221d2007      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcn|||||||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 00$aWhat counts as evidence in linguistics $ethe case of innateness /$fedited by Martina Penke, Anette Rosenbach
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aPhiladelphia $cJ. Benjamins Pub. Co.$d2007
215   $aix, 297 p
225 1 $aBenjamins current topics,$x1874-0081 ;$vv. 7
300   $aIncludes index.
311   $a90-272-2237-1 
327   $aWhat Counts as Evidence in Linguistics -- Editorial page -- LCC data -- Table of contents -- Preface -- What counts as evidence in linguistics? An introduction -- Typological evidence and Universal Grammar -- Remarks on the relation between language typology and Universal Grammar. Commentary on Newmeyer -- Does linguistic explanation presuppose linguistic description? -- Remarks on description and explanation in grammar. Commentary on Haspelmath -- Author's response -- From UG to Universals. Linguistic adaptation through iterated learning -- Form, meaning and speakers in the evolution of language. Commentary on Kirby, Smith and Brighton -- Authors' response -- Why assume UG? -- What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis? Commentary onWunderlich -- Author's response. Is there any evidence that refutes the UG hypothesis? -- A question of relevance. Some remarks on standard languages -- The Relevance of Variation. Remarks on Weiß's Standard-Dialect-Problem -- Author's response -- Universals, innateness and explanation in second language acquisition -- 'Internal' versus 'external' universals. Commentary on Eckman -- Author's response. 'External' universals and explanation in SLA -- What counts as evidence in historical linguistics? -- Abstraction and performance. Commentary on Fischer -- Author's response -- Subject index -- The series Benjamins Current Topics (BCT).
330   $aWhat counts as evidence in linguistics? This question is addressed by the contributions to the present volume. Focusing on the innateness debate, what is illustrated is how formal and functional approaches to linguistics have different perspectives on linguistic evidence.
410  0$aBenjamins current topics ;$vv. 7.
606   $aLinguistic analysis (Linguistics)
606   $aGrammar, Comparative and general
606   $aInnateness hypothesis (Linguistics)
615  0$aLinguistic analysis (Linguistics)
615  0$aGrammar, Comparative and general.
615  0$aInnateness hypothesis (Linguistics)
676   $a410
701   $aPenke$b Martina$01692596
701   $aRosenbach$b Anette$01598918
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910826371003321
996   $aWhat counts as evidence in linguistics$94069803
997   $aUNINA