LEADER 05880nam 2200589 a 450 001 9910826362003321 005 20230725031005.0 010 $a1-283-03452-2 010 $a9786613034526 010 $a90-420-3282-0 035 $a(CKB)2670000000081197 035 $a(EBL)682422 035 $a(OCoLC)712788617 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000517382 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12181160 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000517382 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10488209 035 $a(PQKB)10564661 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC682422 035 $a(OCoLC)709606711 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789042032828 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL682422 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10456316 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL303452 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000081197 100 $a20110406d2011 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn#---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 04$aThe canonical debate today$b[electronic resource] $ecrossing disciplinary and cultural boundaries /$fedited by Liviu Papadima, David Damrosch and Theo D'haen 210 $aAmsterdam $cRodopi$d2011 215 $a1 online resource (338 p.) 225 1 $aInternationale Forschungen zur allgemeinen und vergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft ;$v149 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-420-3281-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $tPreliminary Material --$tA Can(n)on in Need Is a Can(n)on Indeed /$rLiviu Papadima --$tHow Many Canons Do We Need? World Literature, National Literature, European Literature /$rTheo D?haen --$tOpening the Boundaries of National Literatures: From a Multicultural to a Transnational Literary Canon. The American Challenge /$rRodica Mih?il? --$tThe Canon Question and the Value of Theory: Towards a New (Non-) Concept of Universality /$rWilliam Franke --$tEuropean Literary Canon-Building as Federalist Phenomenology /$rCaius Dobrescu --$tWhat to Do about Constructing the Literary Canon: Canonicity and Canonical Criteria /$rDelia Ungureanu --$tFrom Art to Literature: Towards a Counter-Canonical Canon? /$rAdina Ciugureanu --$tEpisteme and Literary Canon. A Parallel between Michel Foucault and Harold Bloom /$rSimona Dr?gan --$tThe Literary Canon and its Religious Precursor /$rZakaria Fatih --$tAgainst the Canon: Jean Cocteau or the Rise of the Gay Cultural Icon /$rFrédéric Canovas --$tThe Day Before, the Day After. Canonic and Self-Legitimation Changes in the Romanian Literature Before and After the Fall of the Communist Regime /$rMagda R?du?? --$tComparative World Literature /$rDavid Damrosch --$tGlobalization and Comparative Literature Revisited ? An Analytical Survey /$rDumitru Radu Popa --$t?Global Literature? ? In Search of a Definition /$rOana Fotache --$tThe Classic Modern Canon and the Disciplinary Separation /$rMihaela Irimia --$tHistoriography or Rhetoric? A Road (Not) Taken in the Evolution of the Literary Field /$rStefan H. Uhlig --$t?Ceci tuera cela?? Literary Canons and the Challenge of Visual Imagery and Popular Culture /$rElaine Martin --$tPopular Culture and the Romanian Postmodernist Canon. The Case of Comics? Authors /$rIon Manolescu --$tNational versus World Literature Seen as a Confrontation between Modernism and Balkanism /$rAlexandra Vrânceanu --$tModernism and the Male World: The Crisis of Masculinity in The Bed of Procrustes /$rIleana Orlich --$tTo Label, to Compare, to Appropriate? As a Strategy of Foreign Literary Criticism /$rRoumiana L. Stantcheva --$tNational Enlisting / European Rallying. Access Criteria to the Continental Space for Romanian Literature /$rCristina Balinte --$tA Romanian Product Refused for Export: Mihai Eminescu, National Poet /$rIoana Both --$tOpenings of the Romanian Poetry Anthologies Translated into French. Canonical Variations during the Communist Period /$rM?d?lina Vatcu --$tAbout the Authors. 330 $aThe Canonical Debate Today. Crossing Disciplinary and Cultural Boundaries re-enacts the canonical issues current in the ?90s from a new perspective, triggered by the changes that occurred worldwide in understanding the concepts and the status of theory, in the legacy of literary studies within the field of humanities, and in cultural production and reception. During the last decade discussions of globalization mostly took into account its impact on the status of academic disciplines such as comparative literature or cultural studies, or the reconfiguration of national literary fields. These debates do not dispense with canonicity altogether but make it more urgent and necessary. Canons seen as sets of norms or regulatory practices are central to the formation of disciplines, to the recognition and transmission of values, even to the articulation of discourses on identity on various levels. The three sections of the volume deal with three interrelated subjects: theories and applicable contexts of the canon ( Canons and Contexts ); recent transformations in the area of literary studies in response to the task of canon formation ( Reshaping Literary Studies ); and the challenges brought to the understanding of the canon(s) by the current process of re-defining literary and cultural boundaries ( Transgressing Literary and Cultural Boundaries ). This volume will appeal to researchers, teachers, and students of cultural studies, comparative literature, and literary theory. 410 0$aInternationale Forschungen zur allgemeinen und vergleichenden Literaturwissenschaft ;$v149. 676 $a220.1/2 701 $aPapadima$b Liviu$01692298 701 $aDamrosch$b David$0629680 701 $aHaen$b Theo d'$0863278 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910826362003321 996 $aThe canonical debate today$94069288 997 $aUNINA