LEADER 05370nam 2200625 a 450 001 9910826223003321 005 20230803021509.0 010 $a90-272-7158-5 035 $a(CKB)2550000001110834 035 $a(EBL)1394820 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000980759 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11533218 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000980759 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10969165 035 $a(PQKB)10070747 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1394820 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1394820 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10746269 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL510726 035 $a(OCoLC)856628047 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001110834 100 $a20130526d2013 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aCasebook in functional discourse grammar$b[electronic resource] /$fedited by J. Lachlan Mackenzie, Hella Olbertz 210 $aAmsterdam $cJohn Benjamins Pub. Co.$d2013 215 $a1 online resource (323 p.) 225 0$aStudies in language companion series,$x0165-7763 ;$vv. 137 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-0604-X 311 $a1-299-79475-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $aCasebook in Functional Discourse Grammar; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Abbreviations; Introduction; References; A new approach to clausal constituent order; 1. Introduction; 2. Constituent ordering in FDG; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Templates; 2.3 Hierarchical ordering; 2.4 Configurational ordering; 3. Classical constituent order typology; 4. A new approach to constituent order typology; 5. An illustration; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Predicate-medial languages; 5.2.1 Introduction; 5.2.2 Dutch; 5.2.3 English; 5.2.4 Leti; 5.2.5 Summary; 5.3 Predicate-initial languages 327 $a5.3.1 Introduction5.3.2 Scottish Gaelic; 5.3.3 Tzotzil; 5.3.4 Kokota; 5.3.5 Summary; 6. Conclusion; References; Spatial adpositions between lexicon and grammar; 1. Introduction: The adposition; 2. Spatial adpositions, lexical and grammatical; 3. Justifying the lexical-grammatical distinction for English and other languages; 4. The Complex Locational Expression and the marking of the semantic category location; 5. The major adpositional constructions across the world's languages; 6. Conclusion; References; Conceptual representation and formulation; 1. Introduction 327 $a2. Outline of the Conceptual Component3. Representing information within the Conceptualizer; 4. Composition of the Conceptual Level Representation; 5. Formulation; 6. Conceptualization and formulation in possessive constructions; 7. Conceptualization and formulation in passive constructions; 8. Conclusion; Abbreviations; References; External possessors and related constructions in Functional Discourse Grammar; 1. Introduction; 2. Constraints on the indirect object external possessors in Dutch; 3. The Dutch indirect object external possessor in relation to other constructions 327 $a3.1 Onomasiological variation3.2 Semasiological variation; 4. The representation of the indirect object external possessor in FDG; 5. The representation of related constructions in FDG; 6. Conclusion; References; Time reference in English indirect speech; 1. Introduction; 2. Temporal reference: Locating situations in time; 3. Previous approaches to tense copying; 3.1 Comrie (1986); 3.2 Declerck (1988); 4. Functional discourse grammar; 5. The function of (not) copying tense; 6. Conclusions; References; Raising in Functional Discourse Grammar; 1. Introduction; 2. Types of raising 327 $a3. The pragmatic motivation of raising processes in Spanish3.1 Subject to subject raising (SRR) in Spanish; 3.1.1 SSR in discourse; 3.2 Subject-to-Object Raising (SOR) in Spanish; 4. A FDG analysis of raising; 4.1 Formal analysis; 4.2 Pragmatic analysis; 5. Conclusion; References; Objective and subjective deontic modal necessity in FDG - evidence from Spanish auxiliary expressions; 1. Introduction; 2. Modal auxiliaries in Spanish; 3. Objective and subjective deontic modality in FDG; 4. The scope of objective and subjective deontic modality; 5. Discussion and conclusion; 6. Summary and outlook 327 $aReferences 330 $aThe theory of FDG claims that deontic modality can be either participant-oriented or event-oriented, both distinctions forming part of the Representational Level. However, there is evidence from Spanish and a number of other languages that event-oriented deontic modality can be coded twice, with different values in one and the same State-of-Affairs. We will therefore distinguish between objective and subjective deontic modality, where the latter has scope over the former. On the basis of the ways in which the expressions of subjective and objective deontic modality interact with tense and othe 410 0$aStudies in Language Companion Series 606 $aFunctional discourse grammar 615 0$aFunctional discourse grammar. 676 $a415 701 $aMackenzie$b J. Lachlan$0610171 701 $aOlbertz$b Hella$f1953-$01603428 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910826223003321 996 $aCasebook in functional discourse grammar$94123108 997 $aUNINA