LEADER 03312nam 2200721Ia 450 001 9910826199503321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-136-56210-9 010 $a1-4175-2221-6 010 $a9786610476077 010 $a600-00-0014-6 010 $a1-136-56211-7 010 $a1-280-47607-9 010 $a1-84977-185-5 024 7 $a10.4324/9781849771856 035 $a(CKB)1000000000794033 035 $a(EBL)430061 035 $a(OCoLC)466435263 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000193720 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11156927 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000193720 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10225840 035 $a(PQKB)10931816 035 $a(OCoLC)608492938 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL430061 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10128886 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL47607 035 $a(OCoLC)55842891 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC430061 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000794033 100 $a20030409d2003 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aLocal forest management $ethe impacts of devolution policies /$fedited by David Edmunds and Eva Wollenberg 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aLondon ;$aSterling, VA $cEarthscan Publications Ltd.$d2003 215 $a1 online resource (xv, 208 pages) 300 $aReprinted 2004. 311 0 $a1-84407-022-0 311 0 $a1-84407-023-9 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p.[189]-203) and index. 327 $aLocal Forest Management The Impacts of Devolution Policies; Copyright; Contents; List of Tables and Boxes; Foreword by M S Swaminathan; Preface; List of Acronyms and Abbreviations; Glossary of Local Terms; 1 Introduction; 2 The Promises and Limitations of Devolution and Local Forest Management in China; 3 Devolution as a Threat to Democratic Decision-making in Forestry? Findings from Three States in India; 4 Creating Space for Local Forest Management: The Case of the Philippines 327 $a5 Whose Devolution is it Anyway? Divergent Constructs, Interests and Capacities between the Poorest Forest Users and States; 6 Conclusion; Notes; References; Index 330 $a'A well written book, astutely organized.'Development and ChangeLocal Forest Management is built around careful and illuminating case studies of the effects of devolution policies on the management of forests in several Asian countries. The studies demonstrate that devolution policies - contrary to the claims of governments - actually increased governmental control over the management of local resources and did so at lower cost. The controversial findings show that if local forest users are to exercise genuine control over forest management, they must be better represented in the processes of 606 $aForest policy$zChina 606 $aForest policy$zIndia 606 $aForest policy$zPhilippines 615 0$aForest policy 615 0$aForest policy 615 0$aForest policy 676 $a333.75/095 701 $aEdmunds$b David$0510955 701 $aWollenberg$b Eva$01650694 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910826199503321 996 $aLocal forest management$94075947 997 $aUNINA