LEADER 04138nam 2200541 450 001 9910826034003321 005 20230808212219.0 010 $a90-04-31158-0 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004311589 035 $a(CKB)3710000000580488 035 $a(EBL)4540528 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001678138 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16488097 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001678138 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)15020732 035 $a(PQKB)10125848 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4540528 035 $a(OCoLC)934617126$z(OCoLC)928781722$z(OCoLC)945184114$z(OCoLC)946103514 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004311589 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000580488 100 $a20160625h20162016 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aRevisiting Aquinas' proofs for the existence of God /$fedited by Robert Arp 210 1$aLeiden, Netherlands ;$aBoston, Massachusetts :$cBrill,$d2016. 210 4$dİ2016 215 $a1 online resource (283 p.) 225 1 $aValue Inquiry Book Series,$x0929-8436 ;$vVolume 289 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-04-31157-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tPreliminary Material /$rRobert Arp -- $tIntroduction /$rRobert Arp -- $tA Motion to Reconsider: A Defense of Aquinas' Prime Mover Argument /$rHeather Thornton Mcrae and James Mcrae -- $tThe Prime Mover Removed: A Contemporary Critique of Aquinas' Prime Mover Argument /$rRichard Geenen and Roger Hunt -- $tA Response to Geenen and Hunt /$rHeather Thornton Mcrae and James Mcrae -- $tA Response to McRae and McRae /$rRichard Geenen and Roger Hunt -- $tThe Relevance of Aquinas' Uncaused Cause Argument /$rGaven Kerr -- $tThe Irrelevance of Aquinas' Uncaused Cause Argument /$rHerbert Roseman -- $tA Response to Roseman /$rGaven Kerr -- $tA Response to Kerr /$rHerbert Roseman -- $tFrom Contingency to Necessary Being /$rAdam Barkman -- $tProblems with Aquinas' Third Way /$rEdward Moad -- $tA Response to Moad /$rAdam Barkman -- $tA Response to Barkman /$rEdward Moad -- $tA Fourth Way to Prove God's Existence /$rDavid Beck -- $tNot So Superlative: The Fourth Way as Comparatively Problematic /$rBenjamin W. Mccraw -- $tA Response to McCraw /$rEdward N. Martin -- $tA Response to Beck /$rBenjamin W. Mccraw -- $tAquinas' Fifth Way and the Possibility of Science /$rMichael Hayes -- $tScience and Nature without God /$rKevin S. Decker -- $tA Response to Decker /$rMichael Hayes -- $tA Response to Hayes /$rKevin S. Decker -- $tWorks Cited /$rRobert Arp -- $tAbout the Contributors /$rRobert Arp -- $tIndex /$rRobert Arp. 330 $aEdited and introduced by Robert Arp, Revisiting Aquinas? Proofs for the Existence of God is a collection of new papers written by scholars focusing on the famous Five Proofs or Ways ( Quinque Viae ) for the existence of God put forward by St. Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274) near the beginning of his unfinished tome, Summa Theologica . It is not an exaggeration to say that not only is Aquinas? Summa a landmark text in the history of Western philosophy and Christianity, but also that the Five Proofs discussed therein?namely, the arguments that conclude to the Unmoved Mover, Uncaused Cause, Necessary Being, Superlative Being, and Intelligent Director?are as compelling today as they were in the 13th Century. Written in a debate format with different scholars arguing for and against each Proof, the papers in the book consist of arguments utilizing various combinations of contemporary science and philosophical ideas to bolster the positions. The result is a revisiting of Aquinas? Proofs that is relevant, stimulating, enlightening, and refreshing. 410 0$aValue inquiry book series ;$vVolume 289. 606 $aGod$xProof 615 0$aGod$xProof. 676 $a100 702 $aArp$b Robert 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910826034003321 996 $aRevisiting Aquinas' proofs for the existence of God$94098505 997 $aUNINA