LEADER 03312nam  22006732  450 
001 9910825957003321
005 20151005020620.0
010   $a1-107-13484-6
010   $a1-280-43435-X
010   $a1-139-14849-4
010   $a0-511-18042-X
010   $a0-511-06115-3
010   $a0-511-05482-3
010   $a0-511-48789-4
010   $a0-511-33098-7
010   $a0-511-06961-8
035   $a(CKB)1000000000018119
035   $a(EBL)218078
035   $a(OCoLC)475924567
035   $a(SSID)ssj0000105088
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11130478
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000105088
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)10086466
035   $a(PQKB)10280860
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511487897
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC218078
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL218078
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10069861
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL43435
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000018119
100   $a20090227d2002||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 13$aAn Aramaic approach to Q $esources for the Gospels of Matthew and Luke /$fMaurice Casey$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2002.
215   $a1 online resource (x, 210 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
225 1 $aSociety for New Testament Studies monograph series ;$v122
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
311   $a0-521-01897-8 
311   $a0-521-81723-4 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 191-205) and indexes.
327   $a1. The state of play -- 2. Method -- 3. Scribes and pharisees: Matthew 23.23-36; Luke 11.39-51 -- 4. John the Baptist: Matthew 11.2-19; Luke 7.18-35 -- 5. Exorcism and overlapping sources. Mark 3.20-30; Matthew 12.22-32; Luke 11.14-23; 12.10 -- 6. Conclusions.
330   $aThis is the first book to examine the Aramaic dimension of Q since the Aramaic Dead Sea scrolls made such work more feasible. Maurice Casey gives a detailed examination of key passages in Matthew and Luke's gospels, demonstrating that they used two different Greek translations of an Aramaic source, which can be reconstructed. He overturns the conventional model of Q as a single Greek document, and shows that Jesus said everything in the original Aramaic source. Further analysis of other gospel passages shows the evangelists editing a Greek translation of an Aramaic source. On one, it can be shown that Mark utilises a different Aramaic source. A complex model of Q is thus proposed. Casey argues that Aramaic sources behind part of Q are of extremely early date, and should contribute significantly to the quest for the historical Jesus.
410  0$aMonograph series (Society for New Testament Studies) ;$v122.
606   $aQ hypothesis (Synoptics criticism)
606   $aAramaic literature$xRelation to the New Testament
615  0$aQ hypothesis (Synoptics criticism)
615  0$aAramaic literature$xRelation to the New Testament.
676   $a226/.066
700   $aCasey$b Maurice$01646694
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910825957003321
996   $aAn Aramaic approach to Q$94042717
997   $aUNINA