LEADER 07053nam 2200589 a 450 001 9910825912003321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-280-19574-6 010 $a9786610195749 010 $a0-309-58653-4 010 $a0-585-14382-X 035 $a(CKB)110986584751418 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000203977 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11188368 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000203977 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10193825 035 $a(PQKB)10456150 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3376400 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3376400 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10055609 035 $a(OCoLC)923263494 035 $a(EXLCZ)99110986584751418 100 $a19940218d1994 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aModeling cost and performance for military enlistment $ereport of a workshop /$fBert F. Green, Jr. and Anne S. Mavor, editors ; Committee on Military Enlistment Standards, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aWashington, DC $cNational Academy Press$d1994 215 $a1 online resource (172 pages) 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 0 $a0-309-05041-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aModeling Cost and Performance for Military Enlistment -- Copyright -- Preface -- Contents -- Opening Remarks: The Nexus Between Science and Policy -- JOB PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT AND ENLISTMENT STANDARDS -- RECRUIT QUALITY: ISSUE OF SCIENCE OR POLICY -- RECRUIT QUALITY, PERFORMANCE, AND COST -- DENOUEMENT -- APPRECIATION -- Cost/Performance Trade-off Model -- Part I: The Context of the Enlistment Standards Project -- ORIGINS OF THE JPM PROJECT -- PROVIDING COST/PERFORMANCE TRADE-OFFS IN LINKING ENLISTMENT STANDARDS TO JOB PERFORMANCE -- WORKSHOP PRESENTATIONS -- REFERENCES -- MILITARY MANPOWER QUALITY: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE -- THE HISTORY OF THE QUALITY ISSUE -- Quality and the All-Volunteer Force -- The Search for Quality Standards -- QUALITY REQUIREMENTS AND TRENDS -- Quality Requirements, 1985-1989 -- Trends in Enlisted Accessions and Quality -- Quality Supply and Demand -- FUTURE TRENDS AND ACTIVE-RESERVE ISSUES -- CONCLUSION -- REFERENCES -- Part II Job Performance Measurement Issues -- SETTING PERFORMANCE GOALS FOR THE DOD LINKAGE MODEL -- THE PERFORMANCE METRIC: DESCRIPTION OF THE SCALE FOR HANDS-ON PERFORMANCE QUALIFICATION -- Task Sampling -- Task Scoring -- Combining Scores from Different Tasks -- A NORMATIVE APPROACH -- Samples -- Variables -- Analyses -- Findings -- CRITERION-REFERENCED APPROACHES -- Phase II Design -- Phase II Results -- Comparison of Task-DPG and Task-APG Results -- Additional Results from Phase III -- Summary of SYNVAL Standard-Setting Results -- CONCLUSIONS -- Summary of Findings -- Implications for Further Research -- Enhancing Performance Level Descriptions -- Linking Job Characteristics to Performance Distribution Targets -- Linking Performance Distribution Targets to Unit Effectiveness and Readiness -- REFERENCES -- PREDICTING JOB PERFORMANCE SCORES WITHOUT PERFORMANCE DATA -- VALIDITY GENERALIZATION. 327 $aSYNTHETIC VALIDITY -- MULTILEVEL REGRESSION ANALYSIS -- An Example -- The Building Blocks of the Linkage Equation: Individual- and Job-Characteristic Variables -- Derivation of the Individual-Characteristic Variables -- Derivation of the Job-Characteristic Variables -- Specification of the Linkage Equation -- Structure of the Linkage Parameters -- The Parameters for the Linkage Equation -- Variance of Predicted Performance Scores -- Deriving Job-Specific Equations -- Validation of the Primary Linkage Equation -- Method -- Results -- Shrinkage Formulae -- Comparison of Adjusted and Cross-Validity R2 Values -- Comparison of Validity Coefficients to the Literature -- Summary -- Discussion -- ACKNOWLEDGMENTS -- REFERENCES -- Part III: The Cost/Performance Trade-off Model -- THE ACCESSION QUALITY COST/PERFORMANCE TRADE-OFF MODEL -- INTRODUCTION -- DESCRIPTION OF THE MODEL -- Variables: Accessions by Recruit Category and Occupation Group -- Recruit Categories -- Occupation Groups -- Constraints: Performance Goals by Occupation -- Definition of Performance -- Measuring Performance -- Setting Performance Goals -- Constraints: Strength Goals -- Objective Function: Recruiting, Training, and Compensation Costs -- Recruiting Costs -- Training and Compensation Costs -- VALIDATION OF THE MODEL -- Model Selections Versus Actual Accession Cohorts -- Variation in Model Scenarios -- Scenario 1: Lower Performance Goals -- Scenario 2: A Higher Unemployment Rate -- Scenario 3: Increase in Training Costs -- Scenario 4: No Effect of Quality on Performances Scores -- SUMMARY -- TECHNICAL APPENDIX -- The Optimization Problem -- Objective Function -- Constraints -- Optimization Approach -- Recruiting Cost Function -- REFERENCES -- POLICY AND MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS OF THE ACCESSION QUALITY COST/PERFORMANCE TRADE-OFF MODEL -- INTRODUCTION. 327 $aCONGRESSIONAL DIALOGUE ON RECRUIT QUALITY STANDARDS -- Importance of Linkages -- Role of the Model -- Hypothetical Accession Program -- Proposed Recruiting Budget Reduction -- Cost of Performance Increase -- THE MODEL AS A PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND EVALUATION TOOL -- Evaluation of a Recruiting Program -- Feasibility -- Efficiency -- Robustness -- Level of Performance -- Developing the Service's Accession Programs -- Setting Recruit Quality Goals and Resources -- Adjusting for Specific Occupational Groups -- Sensitivity to Recruiting Market Conditions -- SETTING ENLISTMENT STANDARDS: ANALYSIS OF OCCUPATION-LEVEL ENLISTMENT STANDARDS -- The Empirical Linkages: Linking Occupational Enlistment Standards to High Quality -- Applying the Cost/Performance Trade-off Model to Enlistment Standards -- Effect of Current Enlistment Standards on Recruit Quality and Cost -- Reducing Enlistment Standards -- SUMMARY -- REFERENCES -- Workshop Participants June 9-11, 1993 -- COMMITTEE ON MILITARY ENLISTMENT STANDARDS -- OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY OF DEFENSE -- CONTRACTORS' REPRESENTATIVES -- AIR FORCE REPRESENTATIVES -- ARMY REPRESENTATIVES -- MARINE CORPS REPRESENTATIVES -- NAVY REPRESENTATIVES -- OTHER GUESTS -- NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL STAFF. 606 $aSoldiers$xRating of$zUnited States$xMathematical models$vCongresses 607 $aUnited States$xArmed Forces$xRecruiting, enlistment, etc$xMathematical models$vCongresses 615 0$aSoldiers$xRating of$xMathematical models 676 $a355.2/23/0973 701 $aGreen$b Bert F$026760 701 $aMavor$b Anne S$01598575 712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bCommittee on Military Enlistment Standards. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910825912003321 996 $aModeling cost and performance for military enlistment$94102297 997 $aUNINA