LEADER 03758nam 2200577 450 001 9910825831903321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-5017-0853-8 010 $a1-5017-0854-6 024 7 $a10.7591/9781501708541 035 $a(CKB)3710000001387318 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4866348 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0001804038 035 $a(OCoLC)961388391 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse57101 035 $a(DE-B1597)492920 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781501708541 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4866348 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11390571 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL1012461 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000001387318 100 $a20170622h20172017 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aAntifundamentalism in modern America /$fDavid Harrington Watt 210 1$aIthaca, New York :$cCornell University Press,$d2017. 210 4$dİ2017 215 $a1 online resource (241 pages) 300 $aPreviously issued in print: 2017. 311 $a0-8014-4827-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tFrontmatter -- $tContents -- $tPreface -- $tAcknowledgments -- $tIntroduction -- $t1. Skeptics -- $t2. Defenders -- $t3. The First Fundamentalists -- $t4. Invention -- $t5. Ratification -- $t6. The Dustbin of History -- $t7. Reinvention -- $t8. Zenith -- $tConclusion -- $tChronology of Events -- $tChronology of Interpretations -- $tNotes -- $tSelect Bibliography -- $tIndex 330 $aDavid Harrington Watt's Antifundamentalism in Modern America gives us a pathbreaking account of the role that the fear of fundamentalism has played-and continues to play-in American culture. Fundamentalism has never been a neutral category of analysis, and Watt scrutinizes the various political purposes that the concept has been made to serve. In 1920, the conservative Baptist writer Curtis Lee Laws coined the word "fundamentalists." Watt examines the antifundamentalist polemics of Harry Emerson Fosdick, Talcott Parsons, Stanley Kramer, and Richard Hofstadter, which convinced many Americans that religious fundamentalists were almost by definition backward, intolerant, and anti-intellectual and that fundamentalism was a dangerous form of religion that had no legitimate place in the modern world. For almost fifty years, the concept of fundamentalism was linked almost exclusively to Protestant Christians. The overthrow of the Shah of Iran and the establishment of an Islamic republic led to a more elastic understanding of the nature of fundamentalism. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, Americans became accustomed to using fundamentalism as a way of talking about Muslims, Jews, Hindus, Sikhs, and Buddhists, as well as Christians. Many Americans came to see Protestant fundamentalism as an expression of a larger phenomenon that was wreaking havoc all over the world. Antifundamentalism in Modern America is the first book to provide an overview of the way that the fear of fundamentalism has shaped U.S. culture, and it will lead readers to rethink their understanding of what fundamentalism is and what it does. 606 $aReligious fundamentalism$xHistory 606 $aReligious fundamentalism$zUnited States$xHistory 606 $aReligion and politics$zUnited States 615 0$aReligious fundamentalism$xHistory. 615 0$aReligious fundamentalism$xHistory. 615 0$aReligion and politics 676 $a200.973/09051 700 $aWatt$b David Harrington$01644795 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910825831903321 996 $aAntifundamentalism in modern America$93990870 997 $aUNINA