LEADER 05504nam 2200697 450 001 9910825786303321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a90-272-6947-5 035 $a(CKB)2670000000571620 035 $a(EBL)1813197 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001350610 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11752940 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001350610 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11293506 035 $a(PQKB)10742637 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1813197 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1813197 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10953246 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL651866 035 $a(OCoLC)893332976 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000571620 100 $a20141023h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aReclaiming control as a semantic and pragmatic phenomenon /$fPatrick Duffley, Universite? Laval 210 1$aAmsterdam, Netherlands ;$aPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (256 p.) 225 1 $aPragmatics & Beyond New Series ;$vVolume 251 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-5656-X 311 $a1-322-20586-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aReclaiming Control as a Semantic and Pragmatic Phenomenon; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Preface; Chapter 1. Linguistic Semantics and Pragmatics - what is said and what is not; Chapter 2. The phenomenon of control; Chapter 3. The meaning of the to-Infinitive and of the Gerund-participle; Chapter 4. Control with the Infinitive and Gerund-participle in subject function; 1. Introduction; 2. Controller identified intra-sententially; 3. Controller identified extra-sententially 327 $aChapter 5. Control with the infinitive and gerund-participle as direct complement of another verb1. The gerund-participle; 2. The infinitive; 3. The explanation of control; 4. Verbs of choice; 5. Verbs of risk; Chapter 6. Control in structures with non-finite verb forms in both subject and complement functions; 1. Introduction; 2. The natural-language semantic categories involved in control structures with non-finite verb forms in both subject and complement functions; 2.1 The semantic content of the non-finite subject; 2.2 The lexical-semantic content of the main verb 327 $a2.3 The semantic content of the complement2.4 The nature of the relationship between the non-finite subject and the main verb; 2.5 The nature of the relationship between the complement and the main verb; 3. Verbs denoting entailment; 4. Verbs denoting risk; 5. Verbs denoting facilitation; 6. Verbs expressing the notion of requirement; 7. Verbs denoting inclusion and exclusion; 8. Verbs expressing avoidance; 9. Verbs denoting justification; 10. Conclusions; Chapter 7. Control in adjective + to-infinitive constructions; 1. Introduction; 2. Subject=subject constructions 327 $a3. Subject=object constructions4. Conclusions; Chapter 8. Control in verb + NP + to-infinitive constructions; 1. Introduction; 2. What the ICE-GB corpus shows; 3. What the ICE-GB doesn't show; 4. Conclusions; Chapter 9. Control in verb + to + gerund-participle vs. verb + to + infinitive constructions; 1. Introduction; 2. Verbs expressing the notion of agreement; 2.1 Introduction; 2.2 The verb agree; 2.3 The verb consent; 2.4 The verb assent; 2.5 The verb acquiesce; 2.6 The verb accede; 2.7 The verb subscribe; 2.8 The verb submit; 2.9 The verb commit 327 $a2.10 Conclusions on verbs expressing the notion of agreement3. Verbs expressing the notions of admitting and attesting; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 The verb admit; 3.3 The verb confess; 3.4 The verb acknowledge; 3.5 The verb avow; 3.6 The verb own; 3.7 The phrasal verb own up to; 3.8 The verb attest; 3.9 The verb testify; 3.10 The verb swear; 3.11 The verb claim; 3.12 Conclusions; Chapter 10. Control in constructions composed of matrix verb + deverbal noun; 1. Introduction; 2. Verbs which have non-subject control with the gerund-participle 327 $a3. Verbs which have subject control with the gerund-participle 330 $aThis monograph is part of a growing research agenda in which semantics and pragmatics not only complement the grammar, but replace it. The analysis is based on the assumption that human language is not primarily about form, but about form-meaning pairings. This runs counter to the autonomous-syntax postulate underlying Landau (2013)'s Control in Generative Grammar that form must be hived off from meaning and studied separately. Duffley shows control to depend on meaning in combination with inferences based on the nature of the events expressed by the matrix and complement, the matrix subject, 410 0$aPragmatics & beyond ;$vVolume 251. 606 $aGrammar, Comparative and general$xInfinitival constructions 606 $aSemantics 606 $aPragmatics 606 $aControl (Linguistics) 615 0$aGrammar, Comparative and general$xInfinitival constructions. 615 0$aSemantics. 615 0$aPragmatics. 615 0$aControl (Linguistics) 676 $a401/.4 700 $aDuffley$b Patrick J.$0623238 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910825786303321 996 $aReclaiming control as a semantic and pragmatic phenomenon$93968328 997 $aUNINA