LEADER 05290nam 2200613 450 001 9910825779203321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a90-04-28117-7 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004281172 035 $a(CKB)2670000000571214 035 $a(EBL)1815787 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001347494 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11869147 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001347494 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11370654 035 $a(PQKB)10717978 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1815787 035 $a(OCoLC)884242766$z(OCoLC)889181206 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004281172 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1815787 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10953644 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL651312 035 $a(OCoLC)893333670 035 $a(PPN)184929938 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000571214 100 $a20141020h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aFormalisation and flexibilisation in dispute resolution /$fedited by Joachim Zekoll, Moritz Ba?lz and Iwo Amelung 210 1$aLeiden, Netherlands :$cBrill Nijhoff,$d2014. 210 4$d©2014 215 $a1 online resource (424 pages) $cillustrations (some color) 300 $aIncludes index. 311 $a90-04-28116-9 311 $a1-322-20032-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $tPreliminary Material -- $tIntroduction: The Changing Face of Dispute Resolution /$rJoachim Zekoll , Moritz Bälz and Iwo Amelung -- $t1 Formalisation of Alternative Dispute Resolution Processes: Some Socio-legal Thoughts /$rMichael Palmer -- $t2 The Private in Public, the Public in Private: The Blurring Boundary between Public and Private Dispute Resolution /$rDeborah R. Hensler -- $t3 China?s Dispute-Resolution Mechanisms and Innovation in the Transformation Era /$rYujun Feng and Xiaolong Peng -- $t4 Mediation and the Rule of Law: The Chinese Landscape /$rHualing Fu -- $t5 No Alternative: Resolving Disputes Japanese Style /$rEric A. Feldman -- $t6 Judicial Dispute Resolution and its Many Alternatives: The Nordic Experience /$rPia Letto-Vanamo -- $t7 ?Explaining? and ?Mediating? is More Important than Penalties: A Comprehensive Explanation of the Resolution of Minor Cases at County Level in Late-Imperial China (1368?1911) /$rJiang Yu -- $t8 The Diversification and Formalisation of ADR in Japan: The Effect of Enacting the Act on Promotion of Use of Alternative Dispute Resolution /$rKota Fukui -- $t9 In/formalisation and Glocalisation of International Commercial Arbitration and Investment Treaty Arbitration in Asia /$rLuke Nottage -- $t10 Informalism and Formalism in the History of ADR in the United States and An Exploration of the Sources, Character, and Implications of Formalism in a Court-sponsored ADR Programme /$rWayne Brazil -- $t11 Unlocking Justice and Markets: The Promise of Consumer ADR /$rChristopher Hodges -- $t12 Private Law Enforcement and ADR: An Arranged Marriage /$rGerhard Wagner -- $tIndex. 330 $aFormal law versus informal justice ? these are two frequently invoked labels to highlight the distinction between court-based and ?alternative? dispute resolution (ADR). Indeed, it appears to be all but a truism to assume that ADR has developed as a more flexible and creative alternative to rigid and formalised judicial proceedings. In Formalisation and Flexibilisation in Dispute Resolution scholars from four continents examine both historical and recent developments that cast doubt on the validity of these widespread assumptions. They not only explore trends towards an increased formalisation of ADR procedures but also address the tendencies of state civil justice systems to adopt flexible and informal tools for the resolution of disputes in the courts. Editors Joachim Zekoll, Moritz Bälz and Iwo Amelung have divided the book into three Parts. Part One seeks to develop the general theme of formalisation from several angles, including a socio-legal perspective, the public-private divide, the regulatory challenges and potential tensions with the rule of law. The emphasis of Part Two is on the historical emergence of formal and informal dispute resolution instruments in several legal and cultural contexts. Historical roots, be they genuine or construed, also play a role in the other two parts of the book, but in this part, they take centre stage. Finally, Part Three features chapters which address and elaborate on specific applications such as ADR as means of consumer dispute resolution and arbitration in transnational investment disputes. While the contributions to the first two parts of this volume already raise normative questions in some respects, this final part evaluates and passes judgement on the potential merits and deficits of ADR in a variety of specific settings. 606 $aDispute resolution (Law)$vCongresses 615 0$aDispute resolution (Law) 676 $a347/.09 702 $aZekoll$b Joachim 702 $aBa?lz$b Moritz 702 $aAmelung$b Iwo 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910825779203321 996 $aFormalisation and flexibilisation in dispute resolution$94023273 997 $aUNINA