LEADER 03800nam 2200541 450 001 9910825594303321 005 20230803195413.0 010 $a3-95489-655-9 035 $a(CKB)2670000000534350 035 $a(EBL)1640342 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001215489 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11770815 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001215489 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11175618 035 $a(PQKB)10575929 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1640342 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1640342 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10856550 035 $a(OCoLC)871779940 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000534350 100 $a20140414h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aBuilding disaster recovery institutions through south-south policy transfer $ecomparative case study of Indonesia and Haiti /$fRalph Myers 210 1$aHamburg, Germany :$cAnchor Academic Publishing,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (100 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a3-95489-155-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aBuilding Disaster Recovery Institutions through South-South Policy Transfer; TABLE OF CONTENTS; LIST OF FIGURES; LIST OF TABLES; ABSTRACT; GLOSSARY; 1. INTRODUCTION; 1.1. PROBLEM STATEMENT AND RESEARCH QUESTION; 1.2. OBJECTIVES; 1.3. RESEARCH DESIGN; 1.4. UTILITY; 2. LITERATURE REVIEW AND THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK; 2.1. LITERATURE REVIEW: ACHIEVING GREATER QUALITY & ACCOUNTABILITY; 2.2. STUDYING POLICY TRANSFER USING CONCEPTUAL/ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORKS; 3. METHODOLOGY; 3.1. COMPARATIVE METHOD; 3.2. RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY; 3.2. CASE SELECTION; 3.3. CONCLUSION 327 $a4. POLICY TRANSFER: A CONCEPTUAL/ANALYTICAL FRAMEWORK4.1. POLICY TRANSFER AS A DEPENDENT VARIABLE; 4.2. SUPPORTING TECHNIQUES FOR THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; 4.3. POLICY TRANSFER AS AN INDEPENDENT VARIABLE; 4.4. CONCLUSION; 5. THIRD VARIABLES: DISASTER IMPACT AND POLITICAL CONTEXT; 5.1. IMPACT OF DISASTER: INDONESIA; 5.2. IMPACT OF DISASTER: HAITI; 5.3. POLITICAL CONTEXT: INDONESIA; 5.4. POLITICAL CONTEXT: HAITI; 5.5. CONCLUSION; 6. POLICY TRANSFER - COMPARING THE BRR AND IHRC; 6.1. ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE AND MANDATE: BRR; 6.2. ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE AND MANDATE: IHRC 327 $a6.3. FUNDING MECHANISMS: BRR6.4. FUNDING MECHANISMS: IHRC; 6.5. ANTI-CORRUPTION MEASURES: BRR; 6.6. ANTI-CORRUPTION MEASURES: IHRC; 6.7. ACTIVITY PRIORITISATION: BRR; 6.8. ACTIVITY PRIORITISATION: IHRC; 6.9. CONCLUSION; 7. ANALYSIS: POLICY TRANSFER AS TWO VARIABLE TYPES; 7.1. POLICY TRANSFER AS A DEPENDENT VARIABLE; 7.2. POLICY TRANSFER AS AN INDEPENDENT VARIABLE; 8. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS; 8.1. CONCLUDING STEP BY STEP; 8.2. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH; REFERENCES 330 $aSince the humanitarian response to the 1994 Rwanda genocide, there has been a growing body of literature on quality and accountability in humanitarian action. One of the most recent trends has been a focus on 'humanitarian cooperation' between the governments of disaster affected countries and other humanitarian actors. The research presented in this book builds on this trend by comparing two governmental recovery agencies, namely the Interim Haiti Recovery Commission (IHRC) and the Aceh Nias Rehabilitation and Reconstruction Agency (BRR). Through a review of the li 606 $aDisaster relief$zLouisiana 615 0$aDisaster relief 676 $a363.348 700 $aMyers$b Ralph$01687296 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910825594303321 996 $aBuilding disaster recovery institutions through south-south policy transfer$94060670 997 $aUNINA