LEADER 03502nam  22007092  450 
001 9910825054903321
005 20151005020621.0
010   $a1-107-70331-X
010   $a1-139-89374-2
010   $a1-107-70204-6
010   $a1-107-67120-5
010   $a1-107-69419-1
010   $a1-107-70406-5
010   $a1-107-59882-6
010   $a1-107-36028-5
035   $a(CKB)2670000000497635
035   $a(EBL)1543708
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001062892
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)12404485
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001062892
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11016525
035   $a(PQKB)10825363
035   $a(UkCbUP)CR9781107360280
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1543708
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1543708
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10826656
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL568877
035   $a(OCoLC)867317064
035   $a(EXLCZ)992670000000497635
100   $a20130313d2013||||  uy|            0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aBalancing constitutional rights $ethe origins and meanings of postwar legal discourse /$fJacco Bomhoff$b[electronic resource]
210  1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2013.
215   $a1 online resource (viii, 280 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s)
225 1 $aCambridge studies in constitutional law ;$v10
300   $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015).
311   $a1-107-62248-4 
311   $a1-107-04441-3 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aQuestioning a global age of balancing -- Balancing's beginnings : concepts and interests -- A perfect constitutional order : balancing in German constitutional jurisprudence of the 1950s and 1960s -- A dangerous doctrine : balancing in US constitutional jurisprudence of the 1950s and 1960s -- Two paradigms of balancing.
330   $aThe language of balancing is pervasive in constitutional rights jurisprudence around the world. In this book, Jacco Bomhoff offers a comparative and historical account of the origins and meanings of this talismanic form of language, and of the legal discourse to which it is central. Contemporary discussion has tended to see the increasing use of balancing as the manifestation of a globalization of constitutional law. This book is the first to argue that 'balancing' has always meant radically different things in different settings. Bomhoff uses detailed case studies of early post-war US and German constitutional jurisprudence to show that the same unique language expresses both biting scepticism and profound faith in law and adjudication, and both deep pessimism and high aspirations for constitutional rights. An understanding of these radically different meanings is essential for any evaluation of the work of constitutional courts today.
410  0$aCambridge studies in constitutional law ;$v10.
606   $aProportionality in law
606   $aConstitutional law
606   $aCivil rights
606   $aJurisprudence$xPhilosophy
615  0$aProportionality in law.
615  0$aConstitutional law.
615  0$aCivil rights.
615  0$aJurisprudence$xPhilosophy.
676   $a342.08/5
700   $aBomhoff$b J$g(Jacco),$01615567
801  0$bUkCbUP
801  1$bUkCbUP
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910825054903321
996   $aBalancing constitutional rights$93945826
997   $aUNINA