LEADER 02351nam  22005054a 450 
001 9910824844503321
005 20240418013556.0
010   $a1-280-28314-9
010   $a0-230-00577-2
010   $a9786610283149
024 7 $a10.1057/9780230005778
035   $a(CKB)1000000000245893
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC343792
035   $a(DE-He213)978-0-230-00577-8
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL343792
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10103785
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL28314
035   $a(OCoLC)559943208
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000245893
100   $a20041215d2005      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurnn|008mamaa
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 14$aThe national interest in international relations theory /$fScott Burchill
205   $a1st ed. 2005.
210   $aHoundmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire ;$aNew York $cPalgrave Macmillan$d2005
215   $a1 online resource (VIII, 224 p.) 
311   $a1-349-52596-0 
311   $a1-4039-4979-4 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 214-221) and index.
327   $aCover -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- 1 Origins and Antecedents -- 2 Conventional Perspectives: Realist Approaches -- 3 Critical Perspectives: Marxist and Anarchist Approaches -- 4 Progressive Perspectives: Liberal Approaches -- 5 Progressive Perspectives: the English School -- 6 Progressive Perspectives: Constructivism -- Conclusion -- Appendix: Tables 1 and 2 -- Bibliography -- Index.
330   $aThis is the first systematic and critical analysis of the concept of national interest from the perspective of contemporary theories of International Relations, including realist, Marxist, anarchist, liberal, English School and constructivist perspectives. Scott Burchill explains that although commonly used in diplomacy, the national interest is a highly problematic concept and a poor guide to understanding the motivations of foreign policy.
606   $aNational interest
615  0$aNational interest.
676   $a327.1/01
700   $aBurchill$b Scott$f1961-$0281421
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910824844503321
996   $aThe national interest in international relations theory$93923982
997   $aUNINA