LEADER 04261nam 2200469 450 001 9910824342103321 005 20230629221418.0 010 $a90-04-46848-X 024 7 $a10.1163/9789004468481 035 $a(CKB)4100000011998948 035 $a(OCoLC)1264469169 035 $a(nllekb)BRILL9789004468481 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6707770 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000011998948 100 $a20220507d2021 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurun####uuuua 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 04$aThe Gulag in writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov $ememory, history, testimony /$fedited by Fabian Heffermehl, Irina Karlsohn 210 1$aLeiden ;$aBoston :$cBrill,$d[2021] 210 4$dİ2021 215 $a1 online resource 225 1 $aStudies in Slavic literature and Poetics ;$vVolume 63 311 $a90-04-46845-5 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $gPart 1.$tLiterary origins.$tDiscontinuities in the evolution of Kolyma Stories and "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" /$rMichael A. Nicholson ;$tPoetry after the Gulag: do Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov have a lyric mindset? /$rUlrich Schmid ;$tMore than a cat : reflections on Shalamov's and Solzhenitsyn's writings through the perspective of trauma studies /$rAndrea Gullotta --$gPart 2.$tMemory and body.$tWhy did Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov not write the Gulag Archipelago together? /$rLuba Jurgenson ;$tTactility and memory in Shalamov /$rFabian Heffermehl ;$t"Grudge-holding body": body and memory in the works of Varlam Shalamov /$rFranziska Thun-Hohenstein ;$tCertain properties of rhyme: poetic language touching abomination /$rIrina Sandomirskaia --$gPart 3.$tHistory and narrative.$tCounterfactuals and history in The Gulag Archipelago /$rIrina Karlsohn ;$t"The Gulag's Archipelago" : rhetoric of history /$rElena Mikhailik ;$tTelling the stories of others and writing the bodies of others: the representation of women in Shalamov's Kolyma Stories and Solzhenitsyn's The Gulag Archipelago /$rJosefina Lundblad-Janjic? ;$tThe issue of "softening" and the problem of addressivity in Solzhenitsyn and Shalamov /$rLeona Toker. 330 $aAlexander Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov are two of the best-known Gulag writers. After a short period of personal acquaintance, their lives and views on literature took different paths. Solzhenitsyn did not see a literary program in Shalamov's works, which he describes as "a result of exhaustion after years of hard labour in the camp". By understanding the text as a "result", Solzhenitsyn critically touched on a concept of evidence, which Shalamov several times emphasized as important to his own works. According to Shalamov, instead of the text being a re-presentation, it should be an extract from or substitute for the real or the factual, by which his Gulag experience became present once again. Concepts such as "document", "thing" and "fact" became important for Shalamov's self-identification as a modernist. At the same time, Solzhenitsyn, viewing his own task as one of restoring historical experiences of the Russian people and trying "to explain the slow course of history and what sort of one it has been", assumed the dual role of writer and historian, which inevitably raises the question of what characterizes the borders between fact and fiction in his works. It also raises question about dichotomies of historical and fictional truth. Contributors: Andrea Gullotta, Fabian Heffermehl, Luba Jurgenson, Irina Karlsohn, Josefina Lundblad-Janjic?, Elena Mikhailik, Michael A. Nicholson, Irina Sandomirskaja, Ulrich Schmid, Franziska Thun-Hohenstein, Leona Toker. 410 0$aStudies in Slavic literature and poetics ;$vVolume 63. 606 $aRussian prose literature$y20th century$xHistory and criticism 615 0$aRussian prose literature$xHistory and criticism. 676 $a891.733 702 $aHeffermehl$b Fabian 702 $aKarlson$b Irina 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910824342103321 996 $aThe Gulag in writings of Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn and Varlam Shalamov$94103445 997 $aUNINA