LEADER 04205nam 2200553 450 001 9910824187803321 005 20230328160258.0 010 $a90-272-0484-5 010 $a90-272-6885-1 035 $a(CKB)2670000000619110 035 $a(EBL)2058743 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001550226 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16161439 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001550226 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14807287 035 $a(PQKB)10975693 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC2058743 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000619110 100 $a20150613h20152015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aApproaches to Hungarian$hVolume 14 $epapers from the 2013 Piliscsaba conference /$feditors, Katalin E?. Kiss, Bala?zs Sura?nyi, E?va De?ka?ny 210 1$aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d2015. 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (302 pages) 225 1 $aApproaches to Hungarian ;$vVolume 14 300 $aIncludes index. 311 08$aPrint version: Approaches to Hungarian. Volume 14. Amsterdam, Netherlands ; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania : John Benjamins Publishing Company, c2015 296 pages Approaches to Hungarian ; Volume 14. 9789027204844 327 $aApproaches to Hungarian; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Introduction; Arguments for arguments in the complement zone of the Hungarian nominal head; 1. Introduction; 2. Approaches to N-complements; 2.1 The Argument (Inheritance) Principle; 2.2 The complement zone of N in Hungarian: Is there any at all?; 2.3 Constituency tests in Hungarian; 2.4 When the "ill-formed" is quite well-formed (according to the literature); 3. Further potential tests concerning the constituent status of noun phrases with a non-empty complement zone; 3.1 Right periphery 327 $a4.4.3 Are first and second person different from third person? 4.5 Interim summary; 5. Conclusions; Acknowledgements; References; Why do sonorants not voice in Hungarian? And why do they voice in Slovak?; 1. Introduction; 1.2 Pre-sonorant voicing; 1.2 Jansen's (2004) phonetically-based approach; 1.3 Voicing assimilation in Hungarian and Slovak; 2. Experiments; 2.1 Speakers; 2.2 Material; 2.3 Method; 2.4 Measurements; 2.5 Statistical analysis; 3. Results; 3.1 Utterance-final position; 3.2 Word-medial intervocalic position; 3.3 Word-final obstruents before /p/ 327 $a3.4 Word-final obstruents before /b/3.5 Pre-sonorant position; 4. Discussion; 5. Conclusion; References; Appendix: Test sentences; Test sentences for Hungarian; Test sentences for Slovak; Word order variation in Hungarian PPs; 1. Introduction; 2. Variation in word order; 2.1 Variation in PP-internal word order; 2.2 Variation in positions in the clause; 2.3 Interim summary; 3. Analysis; 3.1 Background assumptions about PP structure; 3.2 Case-like Ps; 3.3 'Inflexible' case assigning Ps; 3.4 'Flexible' case assigning Ps that cannot be prepositions ; 3.5 'Flexible' case assigning Ps that can be prepositions 330 $aThe acoustic properties associated with prominence (e.g. duration, F0) may also serve for "phonemic" contrasts. The question is thus how speakers correctly interpret these properties. We address this question in terms of an extension of the Functional Load Hypothesis (FLH): given that vowel length is contrastive in Hungarian, the FLH predicts that duration will not be the main cue to prominence (i.e. stress or focus). Based on a large, systematically collected corpus, we demonstrate that this is, in fact, the case; the main cue for both is pitch (F0), though its characteristics are different. 410 0$aApproaches to Hungarian ;$v14. 606 $aHungarian language$xGrammar$vCongresses 615 0$aHungarian language$xGrammar 676 $a408 702 $aKiss$b Katalin E? 702 $aSura?nyi$b Bala?zs$f1975- 702 $aDe?ka?ny$b E?va$f1983- 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910824187803321 996 $aApproaches to Hungarian$92699622 997 $aUNINA