LEADER 05691nam 2200685 450 001 9910823911703321 005 20230803221327.0 010 $a90-272-7039-2 035 $a(CKB)2550000001280558 035 $a(EBL)1682184 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001194062 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12448027 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001194062 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11147630 035 $a(PQKB)11088461 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1682184 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1682184 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10866744 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL601842 035 $a(OCoLC)879643893 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001280558 100 $a20140516h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aGrammatical relations and their non-canonical encoding in Baltic /$fedited by Axel Holvoet, Nicole Nau 210 1$aAmsterdam, Netherlands ;$aPhiladelphia, Pennsylvania :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (378 p.) 225 0 $aValency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic ;$vVolume 1 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-5909-7 311 $a1-306-70591-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and indexes. 327 $aGrammatical Relationsand their Non-Canonical Encoding in Baltic; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Preface; Argument marking and grammatical relations in Baltic: An overview; 1. The project; 2. Alignment and case marking in Baltic; 3. Baltic in a typological context: Alternatives to the transitive pattern; 4. Differential and non-canonical marking; 5. Canonical marking; 6. Concluding remarks and chapter summaries; Abbreviations; Sources; References; Case and word order in Lithuanian infinitival clauses revisited; 1. Introduction; 2. Basics of the Minimalist case theory 327 $a3. Franks & Lavine (2006)4. Franks & Lavine (2006) revised; 5. Typological parallels; 6. Back to Lithuanian: A new analysis; 7. Conclusions and implications; Abbreviations; References; Non-canonical grammatical relations in a modal construction: The Latvian debitive; 1. Introductory remarks; 2. The debitive: A modal form with atypical syntactic properties; 3. Monoclausal and biclausal debitives; 4. The argument structure of modals; 5. Grammatical relations and case marking with the debitive: Earlier discussion; 6. Grammatical relations with the debitive; 7. Some theoretical considerations 327 $a8. Shifts in the case marking of the B argument9. The debitive and voice; 10. The debitive and splits; Abbreviations; References; Alternations in argument realization and problematic cases of subjecthood in Lithuanian; 1. Introduction; 2. Overview of Lithuanian swarm alternations; 3. Semantic properties of the verbs and their arguments in Lithuanian swarm alternation; 4. Discourse-pragmatic functions of the Lithuanian swarm alternation; 5. Non-prototypical subjects in the Lithuanian swarm alternation; 6. Conclusion; Abbreviations; Sources; References; References 327 $aSubjecthood in specificational copular constructions in Lithuanian1. Introduction; 2. The treatment of copular constructions in Cognitive Grammar; 3. Defining specificational copular constructions; 4. Short review of the subject definition in Cognitive Grammar; 5. Subjecthood in specificational copular constructions; 6. Concluding remarks; Abbreviations; References; References; Differential object marking in Latgalian; 1. Introduction; 2. Morphology; 3. Genitive marking with transitive verbs: Clause-level properties; 4. Different marking for different kinds of NPs 327 $a5. Intransitive verbs with genitive arguments6. Conclusions; Acknowledgements; Abbreviations; Sources; References; The independent partitive genitive in Lithuanian; 1. Introduction; 2. Implicit quantifier; 3. Implicit quantifier and aspect; 4. Intensional contexts and negation; 5. Conclusions; Abbreviations; References; On the non-canonical marking of the highest-ranking argument in Lithuanian and Icelandic: Steps towa; 1. Sketch of the project; 2. Theoretical background; 3. A first analysis of verb classes and case marking patterns in Lithuanian and Icelandic; 4. Conclusions and outlook 327 $aAbbreviations 330 $aThis paper is a first report on an ongoing project aiming at building up a database of non-canonical argument marking in Lithuanian in contrast to other languages with relatively rich systems of morphological cases. The language with which we begin the comparison is Icelandic. The overarching aim consists not only in a unified inventorisation of relevant units, but in disclosing (i) regularities in the alternation of coding patterns and (ii) the factors underlying such variation. We will concentrate on case marking; this however implies agreement patterns as well, insofar as in these two langu 410 0$aValency, Argument Realization and Grammatical Relations in Baltic 606 $aBaltic languages$xGrammaticalization 606 $aBaltic languages$xGrammar 606 $aBaltic languages$xCase 615 0$aBaltic languages$xGrammaticalization. 615 0$aBaltic languages$xGrammar. 615 0$aBaltic languages$xCase. 676 $a491.9 702 $aHolvoet$b Axel 702 $aNau$b Nicole 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910823911703321 996 $aGrammatical relations and their non-canonical encoding in Baltic$93997365 997 $aUNINA