LEADER 05249oam 22007215 450 001 9910823839803321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a0-8213-7091-X 024 7 $a10.1596/978-0-8213-7090-2 035 $a(CKB)1000000000474819 035 $a(EBL)459635 035 $a(OCoLC)154225750 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000087670 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12015990 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000087670 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10054564 035 $a(PQKB)10386214 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC459635 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL459635 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10269617 035 $a(The World Bank)150439178 035 $a(The World Bank)ocn150439178 035 $a(US-djbf)14949927 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000474819 100 $a20070801d2007 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aInternal labor mobility in Central Europe and the Baltic Region /$fPierella Paci ... [and others] 210 1$aWashington, D.C. :$cWorld Bank,$d2007. 215 $axix, 79 pages $cillustrations ;$d25 cm 225 0 $aWorld Bank working paper,$x1726-5878 ;$vno. 105 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8213-7090-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 73-79). 327 $aContents; Acknowledgments; Acronyms and Abbreviations; Executive Summary; Figure 1. Adjustment Mechnisms; Figure 2. Measures of Regional Labor Market Disparity; Figure 3. Migrants and Commuters: LFS 2004; Figure 4. Intended Regional Mobility 2001; 1 Introduction; 2 Regional Labor Market Disparities; Box 2.1. The Choice of Regional Unit; Figure 2.1. Minimum and Maximum Regional Unemployment Rates (NUTS 3), 2004; Figure 2.2. Disparities in Regional Unemployment Rates (NUTS2 or Equivalent), 2004; Figure 2.3. Unemployment Rate: National Level and Regional Dispersion 2004 327 $aFigure 2.4. Regional Employment Rates (NUTS2), 2004Figure 2.5. Measures of Regional Labor Market Disparity; Figure 2.6. The Persistence of Regional Unemployment Rates, 1999-2004 (NUTS3); Figure 2.7. Long-Term Unemployment Rate 2000 and 2004; 3 Regional Unemployment Disparities and Adjustment Mechanisms; Figure 3.1. Regional Unemployment and Adjustment Mechanisms; Table 3.1. Evidence on the Wage Curve in the EU8: Selected Studies; Figure 3.2. Total Tax Wedge: 2000 and 2004.; Figure 3.3. Total Tax Wedge: 2000 and 2004; Figure 3.4. Regional Investment Per Capita (NUTS2), 2000-2003 Average 327 $a4 Labor Mobility: Levels and CovariatesFigure 4.1. Average Regional Commuting Rates (NUTS2); Figure 4.2. Internal Migration Rates 2004 (or most recent year); Figure 4.3. Regional Unemployment Rates and Gross Out-migration Rates; Box 4.1. Gender Dimensions of Mobility: Notes from the Sociological Literature; Box 4.2. Ethnic Dimensions of Labor Mobility: Notes from the Sociological Literature; Figure 4.4. Migrants and Commuters: LFS 2004; Table 4.1. Selected Logit Regression Results on Commuting: Labor Force Survey 2004 327 $aTable 4.2. Selected Logit Regression Results on Migration: Labor Force Survey 2004Table 4.3. Selected Logit Regression Results on Migration: Labor Force Survey 2004; Table 4.4. Selected Logit Regression Results on Migration: Labor Force Survey 2004; Figure 4.5. Percent Living in Local Community Since Birth; Figure 4.6. Percent Feeling "Very Close" to Town/Region/Country; Figure 4.7. Percent "Very Willing" to Move to Another Town/Region/Country; Box 4.3. Past and Intended Mobility: Complementary Evidence from EBS:; Figure 4.8. Informal Source of Jobs Information; 5 Summary and Conclusion 327 $aBox 5.1. Commuting and Migration Patterns: Are EU8 Countries Unique?Appendix; Table A.1. Summary of Empirical Studies of Interregional Mobility in Central Europe and the Baltic Region; References 330 $aLarge regional disparities in labor market indicators exist in Central Europe and the Baltic region. Such disparities appear to be persistent over time indicating, in part, a lack of flexibility in the prevailing adjustment mechanisms. Internal labor mobility is often seen as an important instrument to reduce adjustment costs when other mechanisms fail. Drawing from a variety of data sources and utilizing a common empirical framework and estimation strategy, this study identifies patterns and statistical profiles of geographical mobility. It finds internal migration to be generalily low and hi 410 0$aWorld Bank e-Library. 606 $aLabor mobility$zEurope, Central 606 $aLabor mobility$zBaltic States 606 $aMigration, Internal$zEurope, Central 606 $aMigration, Internal$zBaltic States 615 0$aLabor mobility 615 0$aLabor mobility 615 0$aMigration, Internal 615 0$aMigration, Internal 676 $a331.1270943 701 $aPaci$b Pierella$f1957-$01631406 801 0$bVYF 801 1$bVYF 801 2$bSUC 801 2$bBTCTA 801 2$bDLC 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910823839803321 996 $aInternal labor mobility in Central Europe and the Baltic Region$94039691 997 $aUNINA