LEADER 00929cam0-22003491i-450- 001 990003841410403321 005 20080114121546.0 010 $a88-15-07406-6 035 $a000384141 035 $aFED01000384141 035 $a(Aleph)000384141FED01 035 $a000384141 100 $a20030910d2000----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $a--------001cy 200 1 $aEra il secolo del lavoro$fAris Accornero 205 $an. ed. 210 $aBologna$cil Mulino$d2000 215 $a210 p.$d20 cm 225 1 $aContemporanea$v114 610 0 $aLAVORO$aTrasformazione$aAspetti sociali 676 $a306.36 676 $a331$v21$zita 700 1$aAccornero,$bAris$f<1931- >$0116021 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990003841410403321 952 $a306.36 ACC 3$b852$fBFS 959 $aBFS 996 $aEra il secolo del lavoro$9506630 997 $aUNINA LEADER 01729oam 2200469M 450 001 9910716592503321 005 20200213070630.9 035 $a(CKB)5470000002522226 035 $a(OCoLC)1066022855 035 $a(OCoLC)995470000002522226 035 $a(EXLCZ)995470000002522226 100 $a20071213d1926 ua 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aBusiness reply cards in the mails. December 8, 1926. -- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed 210 1$a[Washington, D.C.] :$c[U.S. Government Printing Office],$d1926. 215 $a1 online resource (2 pages) 225 1 $aHouse report / 69th Congress, 2nd session. House ;$vno. 1612 225 1 $a[United States congressional serial set] ;$v[serial no. 8688] 300 $aBatch processed record: Metadata reviewed, not verified. Some fields updated by batch processes. 300 $aFDLP item number not assigned. 606 $aBusiness-reply mail 606 $aPostal rates 606 $aRevenue 606 $aPostcards 608 $aLegislative materials.$2lcgft 615 0$aBusiness-reply mail. 615 0$aPostal rates. 615 0$aRevenue. 615 0$aPostcards. 701 $aKelly$b Clyde$f1883-1935$pProgressive (PA)$01401903 801 0$bWYU 801 1$bWYU 801 2$bOCLCO 801 2$bOCLCQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910716592503321 996 $aBusiness reply cards in the mails. December 8, 1926. -- Committed to the Committee of the Whole House on the State of the Union and ordered to be printed$93510640 997 $aUNINA LEADER 04036nam 2200673 450 001 9910823417403321 005 20230422032510.0 010 $a3-11-091557-X 024 7 $a10.1515/9783110915570 035 $a(CKB)3390000000034579 035 $a(EBL)3043372 035 $a(OCoLC)922946360 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001100487 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11630423 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001100487 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11063261 035 $a(PQKB)10464009 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3043372 035 $a(DE-B1597)45637 035 $a(OCoLC)1013939556 035 $a(OCoLC)1032679596 035 $a(OCoLC)979850507 035 $a(DE-B1597)9783110915570 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3043372 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10772447 035 $a(EXLCZ)993390000000034579 100 $a20131015d2000 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$a"Umlaut" in optimality theory $ea comparative analysis of German and Chamorro /$fThomas B. Klein 205 $aReprint 2013 210 1$aTu?bingen :$cMax Niemeyer Verlag,$d2000. 215 $a1 online resource (158 p.) 225 1 $aLinguistische Arbeiten,$x0344-6727 ;$v416 300 $aDissertation--Newark, Del., Univ. of Delaware, 1995. 311 0 $a3-11-188448-1 311 0 $a3-484-30416-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $tFront matter --$tTable of Contents --$tAcknowledgements --$t1. Introduction --$t2. German umlaut --$t3. Chamorro umlaut --$t4. Conclusion and outlook --$tReferences 330 $aIn this first book-length study of synchronic umlaut, a comprehensive comparative analysis of the phonology and morphology of the umlaut alternation in present-day German and the Austronesian language Chamorro is presented in the framework of Optimality Theory. Umlaut in German and Chamorro is local and noniterative vowel fronting at the edge of a morphological base. Umlaut in German is stress-insensitive, morphologically conditioned, and takes place at the right edge of words, whereas Chamorro umlaut interacts significantly with stress, is phonologically and morphologically conditioned and takes place at the left edge of words. The account of German and Chamorro umlaut presented in this book results in a fresh perspective of the phonology-morphology interface and the interaction between segmental and metrical structure with wide cross-linguistic implications. A new conception of morphological conditioning based on morphological faithfulness and Representation as Pure Markedness is developed. Given this approach, I propose that the requirement that there is no back vowel at the edge of the morphological base plays a fundamental role in German and Chamorro umlaut. It is demonstrated how the interaction of Pure Markedness desiderata and alignment, faithfulness and markedness constraints accounts for German and Chamorro umlaut without floating autosegments. Moreover, a careful analysis of Chamorro stress is able to explain the umlaut-stress interaction without the previously necessary, yet problematic transderivational correspondence relation. The Chamorro data collected for this study through extensive field research on Guam and Saipan contribute significantly to the documentation of this endangered language. 410 0$aLinguistische Arbeiten (Max Niemeyer Verlag) ;$v416. 606 $aGerman language$xPhonology, Comparative$xChamorro 606 $aChamorro language$xPhonology, Comparative$xGerman 606 $aOptimality theory (Linguistics) 615 0$aGerman language$xPhonology, Comparative$xChamorro. 615 0$aChamorro language$xPhonology, Comparative$xGerman. 615 0$aOptimality theory (Linguistics) 676 $a160 700 $aKlein$b Thomas B$0298722 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910823417403321 996 $aUmlaut in Optimality theory$9263977 997 $aUNINA