LEADER 03643nam  2200481   450 
001 9910822889903321
005 20200520144314.0
035   $a(CKB)3710000000929287
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4732988
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11294808
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL968717
035   $a(OCoLC)962452404
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4732988
035   $a(BIP)055638530
035   $a(EXLCZ)993710000000929287
100   $a20161117h20152015  uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aurcnu||||||||
181   $2rdacontent
182   $2rdamedia
183   $2rdacarrier
200 00$aTowards a renewable future $ecase studies of facilities employing extractive nutrient recovery technologies /$fRonald Latimer [and four others]
210  1$aAlexandria, Virginia ;$aLondon, England :$cWater Environment Research Foundation :$cIWA Publishing,$d2015.
210  4$d2015
215   $a1 online resource (140 pages) $cillustrations
225 0 $aWERF Research Report Series ;$vNTRY1R12b
311   $a1-78040-792-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
330 8 $aExtractive nutrient recovery, defined as the production of chemical nutrient products devoid of significant organic matter, represents a complementary strategy for managing nutrients in multiple waste streams. In this option, energy and resources are used to accumulate and produce a chemical nutrient product that is recyclable and has a resale value that could potentially help offset operating costs while reducing nutrient production from raw materials for agricultural or other uses. This report (NTRY1R12b) presents a compilation of case studies of water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) at various stages of implementation of extractive nutrient recovery technologies in the form of struvite crystallization. Of the 20 WRRFs identified in this report, six have implemented or are implementing a struvite crystallization facility and seven have performed desktop and/or pilot evaluations. Data from these thirteen utilities were used to develop the Tool for Evaluating Resource Recovery-Phosphorus (TERRY-Phosphorus), which was used to perform a conceptual level evaluation of implementing struvite recovery at seven other WRRFs.Data from the full-scale WRRFs that have implemented struvite recovery indicate that sidestream soluble phosphorus removals ranged from 80 to 90%, while ammonia removal ranged from 7 to 30%. Struvite production ranged from 64 to 421 metric tonnes per year and was found to be dependent on the site specific conditions and technology employed. Drivers for implementing nutrient recovery included reduction in supplemental carbon requirements for nitrogen removal, reduction in aeration requirements, reduction in biosolids production versus conventional treatment alternatives, reduction in costs associated with mitigating nuisance precipitate formation, benefits to sludge dewaterability, and benefits associated with manipulating the N and P content of the biosolids. Quantifying the economic and non-economic benefits of these drivers together with site specific factors can help drive the implementation of resource recovery systems at full-scale WRRFs.
606   $aSewage$xPurification$xNutrient removal
610   $aSewage
610   $aTechnology & Engineering
615  0$aSewage$xPurification$xNutrient removal.
676   $a628.35
700   $aLatimer$b Ronald$01720898
702   $aKhunjar$b Wendell
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910822889903321
996   $aTowards a renewable future$94119974
997   $aUNINA