LEADER 02454nam 2200565 a 450 001 9910822603003321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-59332-550-9 035 $a(CKB)2550000000035436 035 $a(EBL)837744 035 $a(OCoLC)732955761 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000553389 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11343845 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000553389 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10505119 035 $a(PQKB)11717249 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC837744 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL837744 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10430429 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000035436 100 $a20100115d2010 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aForensic rhetoric $ethe force of closing arguments /$fSusanna Shelton Clason 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aEl Paso, Tex. $cLFB Scholarly Pub.$d2010 215 $a1 online resource (169 p.) 225 1 $aCriminal justice : recent scholarship 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-59332-383-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 139-154) and index. 327 $aThe power of legal rhetoric -- Research design and analytic strategy -- Ethos : a rhetoric of impression -- Logos : the rhetoric of reasoning -- Pathos : a rhetoric of engagement -- Conclusions. 330 $aClason focuses on the closing argument rhetorical practices of five trial attorneys. She seeks to 1) learn how participants utilized rhetorical strategies in closing argument; 2) better understand how they selected those strategies; and 3) examine why they employed the strategies they did through the central categories of ethos, logos, and pathos. Study participants' awareness and consideration of the classical speaker, audience, and message Aristotelian speech situation as well as the power of persuasion demonstrates the continued influence of rhetoric in courts and rhetorical nature of legal 410 0$aCriminal justice (LFB Scholarly Publishing LLC) 606 $aSummation (Law)$zUnited States 606 $aForensic oratory 615 0$aSummation (Law) 615 0$aForensic oratory. 676 $a347.73/75 700 $aClason$b Susanna Shelton$01656821 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910822603003321 996 $aForensic rhetoric$94009904 997 $aUNINA