LEADER 02823nam 2200493 450 001 9910822573703321 005 20230807211231.0 010 $a1-78284-168-7 035 $a(CKB)3710000000218212 035 $a(EBL)1763842 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1763842 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1763842 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10925396 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL635942 035 $a(OCoLC)887094259 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000218212 100 $a20140910h20152015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe literary criticism of Matthew Arnold $eletters to Clough, the 1853 preface, and some essays /$fFlemming Olsen 210 1$aEastbourne, England :$cSussex Academic Press,$d2015. 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (98 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-78284-167-9 311 $a1-322-04691-3 311 $a1-84519-710-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aFront Cover; Title Page; Copyright; Contents; Preface; Introduction; Wordsworth; Coleridge; Shelley; Leigh Hunt; Chapter One: The Intellectual Landscape of the Mid-VictorianAge; Chapter Two: The Letters of Matthew Arnold to Arthur Hugh Clough; Chapter Three: The Preface of 1853; Summary; Subject; The Poet''s Task; Creation; Models: Classics, Moderns, Shakespeare, Representation, Parts and Wholes; Form, Clough, Carlyle; Concluding Remarks; Chapter Four: Influences: Goethe, Sainte-Beuve ; Goethe; Sainte-Beuve; Chapter Five: The Schools Inspector and Essay Writer; The Essays; Science; Eliot 327 $aChapter Six: Arnold as a Literary CriticThe Function of Criticism at the Present Time; Terminological Vagueness; Maurice de Gue?rin; Concluding Remarks; Conclusion; Notes; Bibliography; Index; Back Cover 330 $aMany of the ideas that appear in poet Matthew Arnold's Preface to the Poems of 1853 to his collection of poems and in his later essays are suggested in the letters that Arnold wrote to his friend Arthur Hugh Clough. Literature was, in Arnold's perception, meant to communicate a message rather than impress by its structure or by formal sophistication. Modern theories of coalescence between content and form were outside the contemporary paradigm. T. S. Eliot's ambivalent attitude to Arnold-at once reluctantly admiring and decidedly patronizing-is puzzling. Eliot never seemed able to liberate him 676 $a821/.8 686 $aLCO010000$2bisacsh 700 $aOlsen$b Flemming$0855985 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910822573703321 996 $aThe literary criticism of Matthew Arnold$93978294 997 $aUNINA