LEADER 03915nam 22007572 450 001 9910822081903321 005 20151005020621.0 010 $a1-139-36593-2 010 $a1-107-22839-5 010 $a0-511-84259-7 010 $a1-280-64747-7 010 $a9786613633521 010 $a1-139-37848-1 010 $a1-139-37562-8 010 $a1-139-37705-1 010 $a1-139-37163-0 010 $a1-139-37991-7 035 $a(CKB)2550000000103572 035 $a(EBL)880656 035 $a(OCoLC)794327674 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000659255 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12312525 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000659255 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10695528 035 $a(PQKB)10379231 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511842597 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL880656 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10565009 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL363352 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC880656 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000000103572 100 $a20101026d2012|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 14$aThe U.S. women's jury movements and strategic adaptation $ea more just verdict /$fHolly J. McCammon$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2012. 215 $a1 online resource (xviii, 298 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 1 $aCambridge studies in contentious politics 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 $a1-107-66326-1 311 $a1-107-00992-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aIntroduction : the women's jury movements and strategic adaptation -- Theorizing social movement strategic adaptation -- Broadening women's citizenship : a history of U.S. women's jury rights -- Responding to political defeats -- Countering public opposition and indifference -- Taking advantage of cultural opportunities -- Turning the movement around -- Comparing the movements : qualitative comparative analysis -- Conclusion : final thoughts on strategic adaptation and social movement agency. 330 $aWhen women won the vote in the United States in 1920 they were still routinely barred from serving as jurors, but some began vigorous campaigns for a place in the jury box. This book tells the story of how women mobilized in fifteen states to change jury laws so that women could gain this additional right of citizenship. Some campaigns quickly succeeded; others took substantially longer. The book reveals that when women strategically adapted their tactics to the broader political environment, they were able to speed up the pace of jury reform, while less strategic movements took longer. A comparison of the more strategic women's jury movements with those that were less strategic shows that the former built coalitions with other women's groups, took advantage of political opportunities, had past experience in seeking legal reforms and confronted tensions and even conflict within their ranks in ways that bolstered their action. 410 0$aCambridge studies in contentious politics. 517 3 $aThe U.S. Women's Jury Movements & Strategic Adaptation 606 $aWomen jurors$zUnited States$xHistory 606 $aJury$zUnited States$xHistory 606 $aWomen$xLegal status, laws, etc$zUnited States 606 $aLaw$xPolitical aspects 615 0$aWomen jurors$xHistory. 615 0$aJury$xHistory. 615 0$aWomen$xLegal status, laws, etc. 615 0$aLaw$xPolitical aspects. 676 $a345.73/075 686 $aPOL040000$2bisacsh 700 $aMcCammon$b Holly J.$f1959-$01613947 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910822081903321 996 $aThe U.S. women's jury movements and strategic adaptation$93943509 997 $aUNINA