LEADER 04254nam 2200733 a 450 001 9910822052103321 005 20240527143300.0 010 $a0-8232-4688-4 010 $a0-8232-3672-2 010 $a1-282-69886-9 010 $a9786612698866 010 $a0-8232-3876-8 010 $a0-8232-2936-X 024 7 $a10.1515/9780823238767 035 $a(CKB)2520000000008081 035 $a(MH)012009598-X 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000432299 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11304228 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000432299 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10494038 035 $a(PQKB)11650027 035 $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000021332 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3239450 035 $a(OCoLC)650219018 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)muse14905 035 $a(DE-B1597)555184 035 $a(DE-B1597)9780823238767 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3239450 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10365068 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL269886 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC476651 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL476651 035 $a(EXLCZ)992520000000008081 100 $a20081017d2009 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aWhat is Talmud? $ethe art of disagreement /$fSergey Dolgopolski 205 $aFirst edition. 210 1$aNew York :$cFordham University Press,$d2009. 215 $a1 online resource (xii, 333 pages) 300 $aBibliographic Level Mode of Issuance: Monograph 311 $a0-8232-2934-3 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 319-325) and index. 327 $tFrontmatter --$tContents --$tPreface --$tAcknowledgments --$tIntroduction --$t1. What Is Talmud? --$t2. The Talmud in Heidegger?s Aftermath --$t3. The Art of (the) Talmud --$t4. Talmud as Event --$t5. The Ways of the Talmud in Its Rhetorical Dimension: A Performative Analytical Description --$t6. The Art of Disagreement --$tNotes --$tWorks Cited --$tIndex 330 $aTrue disagreements are hard to achieve, and even harder to maintain, for the ghost of final agreement constantly haunts them. The Babylonian Talmud, however, escapes from that ghost of agreement, and provokes unsettling questions: Are there any conditions under which disagreement might constitute a genuine relationship between minds? Are disagreements always only temporary steps toward final agreement? Must a community of disagreement always imply agreement, as in an agreement to disagree? What is Talmud? rethinks the task of philological, literary, historical, and cultural analysis of the Talmud. It introduces an aspect of this task that has best been approximated by the philosophical, anthropological, and ontological interrogation of human being in relationship to the Other-whether animal, divine, or human. In both engagement and disengagement with post-Heideggerian traditions of thought, Sergey Dogopolski complements philological-historical and cultural approaches to the Talmud with a rigorous anthropological, ontological, and Talmudic inquiry. He redefines the place of the Talmud and its study, both traditional and academic, in the intellectual map of the West, arguing that Talmud is a scholarly art of its own and represents a fundamental intellectual discipline, not a mere application of logical, grammatical, or even rhetorical arts for the purpose of textual hermeneutics. In Talmudic intellectual art, disagreement is a fundamental category. What Is Talmud? rediscovers disagreement as the ultimate condition of finite human existence or co-existence. 606 $aReasoning 606 $aRhetoric 615 0$aReasoning. 615 0$aRhetoric. 676 $a296.1/2506 676 $a296.12506 700 $aDolgopol?skii?$b S. B$g(Sergei? Borisovich)$01684980 712 02$aProject Muse 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910822052103321 996 $aWhat is Talmud$94121420 997 $aUNINA 999 $aThis Record contains information from the Harvard Library Bibliographic Dataset, which is provided by the Harvard Library under its Bibliographic Dataset Use Terms and includes data made available by, among others the Library of Congress