LEADER 01154nam0-22003371i-450- 001 990007117750403321 005 20120904125031.0 035 $a000711775 035 $aFED01000711775 035 $a(Aleph)000711775FED01 035 $a000711775 100 $a20020916d2000----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $aa---ab--011yy 200 1 $aGiubileo a Napoli: un affare di stato$e1725-1825$emostra documentaria e iconografica, Napoli, Archivio di Stato, 19 ottobre 2000 - 31 marzo 2001$fArchivio di Stato di Napoli 210 $a[S.l.$cs.n.]$eMarigliano$gIstituto Anselmi$dstampa 2000 215 $a220 p.$cill.$d25 cm 610 0 $aGiubilei$aNapoli$aSec. 18.-19.$aFonti documentarie 610 0 $aGiubilei$aStoria ecclesiastica$aPolitica 676 $a263.97$v21$zita 710 02$aArchivio di Stato di Napoli$09789 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990007117750403321 952 $a263.97 MOSTRE NAPOLI 2001$bBibl. 42800$fFLFBC 952 $a01.409$bs.i.$fDARST 959 $aFLFBC 959 $aDARST 996 $aGiubileo a Napoli: un affare di stato$9702845 997 $aUNINA LEADER 00945nam0-22003251i-450 001 990001786710403321 005 20200724105552.0 010 $a1-85728-132-2 035 $a000178671 035 $aFED01000178671 035 $a(Aleph)000178671FED01 035 $a000178671 100 $a20021010d1995----km-y0itay50------ba 101 0 $aeng 102 $aGB 105 $ay 001yy 200 1 $a<>introduction to experimental design and statistics for biology$fDavid Heath. 210 $aLondon$cUniversity College London$d1995 215 $aIX, 372 p.$d24 cm 610 0 $aBiometria 676 $a570.15195$v23$zita 700 1$aHeath,$bDavid$078073 801 0$aIT$bUNINA$gRICA$2UNIMARC 901 $aBK 912 $a990001786710403321 952 $a60 570.151 HEAD 1995$b5160$fFAGBC 959 $aFAGBC 996 $aIntroduction to experimental design and statistics for biology$9407918 997 $aUNINA DB $aING01 LEADER 05029nam 2200721 450 001 9910822037103321 005 20230808191920.0 035 $a(CKB)3710000000609787 035 $a(EBL)4441474 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001624635 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16361798 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001624635 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14916875 035 $a(PQKB)10975055 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16343133 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14916876 035 $a(PQKB)22869972 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4441474 035 $a(DLC) 2016009282 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000609787 100 $a20160223h20162016 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aHumour and relevance /$fFrancisco Yus 210 1$aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d[2016] 210 4$dİ2016 215 $a1 online resource (389 p.) 225 1 $aTopics in Humor Research (THR),$x2212-8999 ;$v4 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a90-272-6721-9 311 $a90-272-0231-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and indexes. 327 $aHumour and Relevance; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Dedication page; Table of Contents; Acknowledgement ; Introduction; Relevance theory; 1.1 Introduction: An inferential model of communication; 1.2 Gricean pragmatics; 1.3 Manifestness and cognitive environments; 1.4 Principles and conditions of relevance; 1.5 Comprehension; 1.6 Explicit versus implicated interpretations; 1.7 Social aspects of communication; Relevance theory; 2.1 Introduction: An inferential model of communication; 2.2 Gricean pragmatics; 2.3 Manifestness and cognitive environments 327 $a2.4 Principles and conditions of relevance2.5 Comprehension; 2.6 Explicit versus implicated interpretations; 2.7 Social aspects of communication; Incongruity-resolution revisited; 3.1 Introduction; 3.2 Background; 3.3 Theories and classifications; 3.3.1 Suls' two-stage model; 3.3.2 Ritchie's forced reinterpretation model; 3.3.3 Dynel's three-fold classification; 3.3.4 Koestler's bisociation theory; 3.3.5 Giora's graded salience hypothesis; 3.3.6 Raskin's SSTH and Attardo and Raskin's GTVH; 3.4 Make-sense frame versus discourse inference; 3.4.1 Frame; 3.4.2 Schema; 3.4.3 Script 327 $a3.4.4 Make-sense frame3.5 Why is incongruity humorous?; 3.6 Are incongruity and resolution needed?; 3.6.1 Incongruity is sufficient; 3.6.2 Resolution is also necessary; 3.6.3 Incongruity is solved but persists; 3.7 Incongruity-resolution and relevance; 3.8 A new classification of incongruity-resolution patterns; 3.8.1 [frame-based incongruity] [setup] [discourse-based resolution]; 3.8.2 [frame-based incongruity] [punchline] [discourse-based resolution]; 3.8.3 [frame-based incongruity] [setup] [frame-based resolution]; 3.8.4 [frame-based incongruity] [punchline] [frame-based resolution] 327 $a3.8.5 [frame-based incongruity] [setup] [implication-based resolution]3.8.6 [frame-based incongruity] [punchline] [implication-based resolution]; 3.8.7 [discourse-based incongruity] [setup] [discourse-based resolution]; 3.8.8 [discourse-based incongruity] [punchline] [discourse-based resolution]; 3.8.9 [discourse-based incongruity] [setup] [frame-based resolution]; 3.8.10 [discourse-based incongruity] [punchline] [frame-based resolution]; 3.8.11 [discourse-based incongruity] [setup] [implication-based resolution]; 3.8.12 [discourse-based incongruity] [punchline] [implication-based resolution] 327 $aThe intersecting circles model of humorous communication4.1 Introduction; 4.2 Utterance interpretation as mutual parallel adjustment; 4.3 Make-sense frames and interaction; 4.4 Cultural frames; 4.5 Mind reading and predicted humorous effects; 4.6 Make-sense frames and cultural frames in joke interpretation; 4.7 Towards a new typology of jokes: The Intersecting Circles Model; 4.7.1 Type 1: Make-sense frame + cultural frame + utterance interpretation; 4.7.2 Type 2: Make-sense frame + cultural frame; 4.7.3 Type 3: Make-sense frame + utterance interpretation; 4.7.4 Type 4: Make-sense frame 327 $a4.7.5 Type 5: Cultural frame + utterance interpretation 410 0$aTopics in humor research ;$v4. 606 $aDiscourse analysis 606 $aWit and humor$xHistory and criticism$xTheory 606 $aRelevance 606 $aPragmatics 606 $aCognitive psychology 606 $aPsycholinguistics 615 0$aDiscourse analysis. 615 0$aWit and humor$xHistory and criticism$xTheory. 615 0$aRelevance. 615 0$aPragmatics. 615 0$aCognitive psychology. 615 0$aPsycholinguistics. 676 $a809.7/00141 700 $aYus$b Francisco$0591614 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910822037103321 996 $aHumour and relevance$94046890 997 $aUNINA