LEADER 03782nam 2200469 450 001 9910821585803321 005 20230807215458.0 010 $a0-309-34741-6 010 $a0-309-34739-4 035 $a(CKB)3710000000411291 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3379441 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000411291 100 $a20150424h20152015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 00$aDeveloping a framework for measuring community resilience $esummary of a workshop /$fDominic A. Brose, rapporteur 210 1$aWashington, District of Columbia :$cNational Academies Press,$d2015. 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (49 pages) $ccolor illustrations 311 $a0-309-36761-1 311 $a0-309-34738-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aDeveloping Resilience Indicators and Measures -- Implementing Resilience Indicators and Measures at the Community Level -- Developing a Decision-Making Framework -- Appendix A: Breakout Group Tables -- Appendix B: Workshop Agenda -- Appendix C: Steering Committee, Speaker, and Moderator Biographies 330 $a"The 2012 National Research Council report Disaster Resilience: A National Imperative highlighted the challenges of increasing national resilience in the United States. One finding of the report was that "without numerical means of assessing resilience, it would be impossible to identify the priority needs for improvement, to monitor changes, to show that resilience had improved, or to compare the benefits of increasing resilience with the associated costs." Although measuring resilience is a challenge, metrics and indicators to evaluate progress, and the data necessary to establish the metric, are critical for helping communities to clarify and formalize what the concept of resilience means for them, and to support efforts to develop and prioritize resilience investments. One of the recommendations from the 2012 report stated that government entities at federal, state, and local levels and professional organizations should partner to help develop a framework for communities to adapt to their circumstances and begin to track their progress toward increasing resilience. To build upon this recommendation and begin to help communities formulate such a framework, the Resilient America Roundtable of the National Academies convened the workshop Measures of Community Resilience: From Lessons Learned to Lessons Applied on September 5, 2014 in Washington, D.C. The workshop's overarching objective was to begin to develop a framework of measures and indicators that could support community efforts to increase their resilience. The framework will be further developed through feedback and testing in pilot and other partner communities that are working with the Resilient America Roundtable. This report is a summary of the one-day workshop, which consisted of a keynote address and two panel sessions in the morning and afternoon breakout sessions that began the discussion on how to develop a framework of resilience measures."-- Publisher's description 606 $aEmergency management$zUnited States$vCongresses 607 $aUnited States$2fast 615 0$aEmergency management 676 $a363.347 702 $aBrose$b Dominic A. 712 02$aResilient America Roundtable. 712 02$aPolicy and Global Affairs Division. 712 02$aNational Research Council (U.S.).$bCommittee on Measures of Community Resilience. 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910821585803321 996 $aDeveloping a framework for measuring community resilience$93941608 997 $aUNINA