LEADER 05711nam 2200697 450 001 9910821518703321 005 20231127235312.0 010 $a1-78785-811-1 010 $a1-62637-513-5 024 7 $a10.1515/9781626375130 035 $a(CKB)3710000000645070 035 $a(EBL)4505023 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001652829 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)16427643 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001652829 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)14800634 035 $a(PQKB)11228721 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL4505023 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr11207168 035 $a(OCoLC)946725705 035 $a(DE-B1597)623635 035 $a(DE-B1597)9781626375130 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4505023 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000645070 100 $a20160517h20162016 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aRace and the death penalty $ethe legacy of McCleskey v. Kemp /$fedited by David P. Keys and R. J. Maratea 210 1$aBoulder, Colorado ;$aLondon, [England] :$cLynne Rienner Publishers,$d2016. 210 4$dİ2016 215 $a1 online resource (231 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-62637-356-6 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aTitle Page ; Copyright page ; Dedication page ; Contents ; Tables and Figures ; Table 5.1 Likelihood of Prosecutor Seeking the Death Penalty and Capital Punishment Being Sentenced Based on Race of Defendant and Victim; Table 7.1 Probability of Prosecutor Seeking a Death Sentence by Offender and Victim's Race and Offender/Victim Racial Combinations; Table 7.2 Probability of Prosecutor Seeking a Death Sentence by Location of the Homicide; Table 7.3 Logistic Regression Results for the Decision of the Prosecutor to Seek a Death Sentence, Case Characteristics 327 $aTable 7.4 Logistic Regression Results for the Decision of the Prosecutor to Seek a Death Sentence, Adjusted Racial and Geographic FactorsTable 7.5 Covariate Balance Before and After Case Matching on Race of Victim and Urban/Rural (reported as proportions); Table 9.1 Probability of Prosecutor Charging Capital Homicide (Phase 1); Table 9.2 Probability of Prosecutor Requesting Death Penalty(Phase 2); Table 9.3 Probability of Death Sentence (Phase 3); Figure 11.1 Comparing Death Row Populations and Executions in Texas and California; Acknowledgments 327 $aChapter 1- Racial Bias and Capital Punishment Part 1- The Crisis of Race and Capital Punishment ; Chapter 2- McCleskey v. Kemp and the Reaffirmation of Separate but Equal ; Placing McCleskey in Historical Context ; Institutionalized Discrimination and Capital Punishment; What Is to Be Done?; Note ; Chapter 3- Revisiting McCleskey v. Kemp: A Failure of Sociological Imagination?; The Baldus Study; McCleskey v. Kemp: "Private Trouble" or "Public Issue"?; Assumptions of the Court's Legal Theory; Chapter 4- McCleskey and the Lingering Problem of "Race"; The Death Penalty: Still Discriminatory 327 $aHow McCleskey Ensures the Death Penalty Remains ArbitraryConclusion; Notes; Part 2- Race, Class, and Capital Sentencing ; Chapter 5- Overcoming Moral Peril: How Empirical Research Can Affect Death Penalty Debates; Morality and the Death Penalty Debate; From the Moral to the Empirical: Using Datato Evaluate the Efficacy of Capital Punishment; Judicial Interpretations of Statistical Data Pertaining to Capital Punishment; Conclusion; Notes; Chapter 6- Capital Sentencing and Structural Racism: The Source of Bias; The Role of the Prosecutor; Role of the Capital Jury; The Sources of Racial Bias 327 $aPotential RemediesConclusion; Notes; Chapter 7- Capital Case Processing in George After McCleskey: More of the Same ; Research on Capital Sentencing; Data Sources; Results; Discussion; Appendix A: Case Characteristics; Appendix B: Georgia Statutory Aggravating Factors; Notes; Chapter 8- Addressing Contradictions with the Social Psychology of Capital Juries and Racial Bias; Juror Characteristics; Stereotypes, Concentration, and the Capital Jury; Attitude/Stereotype Concentration and Group Polarization; Intensification of Juror Attitudes and Perceptions; Group Polarization; Conclusion ; Notes 327 $aChapter 9- Nothing Succeeds Like Failure: Race, Decisionmaking, and Proportionality in Oklahoma Homicide Trials, 1973-2010 330 $aIn what has been called the Dred Scott decision of our times, the US Supreme Court found in McCleskey v. Kemp that evidence of overwhelming racial disparities in the capital punishment process could not be admitted in individual capital cases-in effect institutionalizing a racially unequal system of criminal justice. Exploring the enduring legacy of this radical decision nearly three decades later, the authors of Race and the Death Penalty examine the persistence of racial discrimination in the practice of capital punishment, the dynamics that drive it, and the human consequences of both. 606 $aCapital punishment$zUnited States 606 $aDiscrimination in capital punishment$zUnited States 606 $aDiscrimination in criminal justice administration$zUnited States 610 $aMcCleskey v. Kemp 615 0$aCapital punishment 615 0$aDiscrimination in capital punishment 615 0$aDiscrimination in criminal justice administration 676 $a345.73/0773 702 $aKeys$b David P. 702 $aMaratea$b R. J.$f1973- 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910821518703321 996 $aRace and the death penalty$94036526 997 $aUNINA