LEADER 03104nam 2200625 450 001 9910820987403321 005 20230124192944.0 010 $a0-19-026694-5 010 $a0-19-997851-4 035 $a(CKB)3710000000355047 035 $a(EBL)1961770 035 $a(OCoLC)903858586 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001421357 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12568135 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001421357 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11410312 035 $a(PQKB)10859526 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1961770 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000355047 100 $a20150217h20152015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aMaking 20th century science $ehow theories became knowledge /$fStephen G. Brush with Ariel Segal 210 1$aNew York, New York :$cOxford University Press,$d2015. 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (553 p.) 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-322-96490-4 311 $a0-19-997815-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $a""4.2 The Rise of Social Constructionism""""4.3 The Fall of Social Constructionism""; ""4.4 Postmortem""; ""4.5 Consequences for Science Studies""; ""Part Two Atoms, Molecules, and Particles""; ""5 Mendeleeva???s Periodic Law""; ""5.1 Mendeleev and the Periodic Law""; ""5.2 Novel Predictions""; ""5.3 Mendeleeva???s Predictions""; ""5.4 Reception By Whom?""; ""5.5 Tests of Mendeleeva???s Predictions""; ""5.6 Before the Discovery of Gallium""; ""5.7 The Impact of Gallium and Scandium""; ""5.8 The Limited Value of Novel Predictions""; ""5.9 Implications of the Law""; ""5.10 Conclusions"" 327 $a""7.8 Reception of Neo-Newtonian Optics before 1923"" 330 $aHistorically, the scientific method has been said to require proposing a theory, making a prediction of something not already known, testing the prediction, and giving up the theory (or substantially changing it) if it fails the test. A theory that leads to several successful predictions is more likely to be accepted than one that only explains what is already known but not understood. This process is widely treated as the conventional method of achieving scientific progress, and was used throughout the twentieth century as the standard route to discovery and experimentation. But does science 606 $aScience$xMethodology$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aScience$xHistory$y20th century 606 $aScience$xMethodology$xHistory$y19th century 606 $aScience$xHistory$y19th century 615 0$aScience$xMethodology$xHistory 615 0$aScience$xHistory 615 0$aScience$xMethodology$xHistory 615 0$aScience$xHistory 676 $a509.04 676 $a509/.04 700 $aBrush$b Stephen G.$017850 702 $aSegal$b Ariel 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910820987403321 996 $aMaking 20th century science$94050974 997 $aUNINA