LEADER 03352nam 2200649 a 450 001 9910820395103321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-107-18411-8 010 $a1-281-38373-2 010 $a9786611383732 010 $a0-511-39795-X 010 $a0-511-49154-9 010 $a0-511-40056-X 010 $a0-511-39718-6 010 $a0-511-39645-7 010 $a0-511-39874-3 035 $a(CKB)1000000000406984 035 $a(EBL)343531 035 $a(OCoLC)235974362 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000099972 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11124699 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000099972 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10016791 035 $a(PQKB)11195365 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511491542 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL343531 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10229654 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL138373 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC343531 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000406984 100 $a20080611d2008 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aAfter Bush $ethe case for continuity in American foreign policy /$fTimothy J. Lynch and Robert S. Singh 210 $aCambridge ;$aNew York $cCambridge University Press$d2008 215 $a1 online resource (xii, 382 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 $a0-521-88004-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 343-370) and index. 327 $aIntroduction: Winning the Second Cold War -- 1. Bush and the American foreign policy tradition -- 2. The constitution of American national security -- 3. The Second Cold War on Islamist terror: negative audits -- 4. The Second Cold War on Islamist terror: a positive audit -- 5. Iraq: Vietnam in the sand? -- 6. The Middle East: reformation or Armageddon -- 7. Friends and foes after Bush -- 8. The emerging consensus at home and abroad -- Conclusion: The case for continuity. 330 $aThe foreign policy of the George W. Bush administration has won few admirers, and many anticipate that his successor will repudiate the actions of the past eight years. In their provocative account Lynch and Singh argue that Bush's policy should be placed within the mainstream of the American foreign policy tradition. Further, they suggest that there will, and should, be continuity in US foreign policy from his presidency to those of his successors. Providing a positive audit of the war on terror (which they contend should be understood as a Second Cold War) they maintain that the Bush doctrine has been consistent with past policy at times of war and that the key elements of Bush's grand strategy will continue to shape America's approach in the future. Above all, they predict that his successors will pursue the war against Islamist terror with similar dedication. 606 $aWar on Terrorism, 2001-2009 607 $aUnited States$xForeign relations$y2001-2009 615 0$aWar on Terrorism, 2001-2009. 676 $a327.73009051 700 $aLynch$b Timothy J.$f1969-$01602497 701 $aSingh$b Robert$0802068 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910820395103321 996 $aAfter Bush$94204600 997 $aUNINA