LEADER 01400nam--2200445---450- 001 990001793880203316 005 20051104101731.0 035 $a000179388 035 $aUSA01000179388 035 $a(ALEPH)000179388USA01 035 $a000179388 100 $a20040625d1976----km-y0itay0103----ba 101 0 $aita 102 $aIT 105 $a||||||||001yy 200 1 $aCome si diventa devianti$fDavid Matza 210 $aBologna$cIl Mulino$d1976 215 $a315 p.$d19 cm. 225 2 $aUniversale paperbacks Il mulino$v33 300 $aTrad. di Maristella Petacchi 410 0$12001$aUniversale paperbacks Il mulino$v348 454 1$12001 461 1$1001-------$12001 700 1$aMATZA,$bDavid$0142777 702 1$aPETACCHI,$bMariastella 801 0$aIT$bsalbc$gISBD 912 $a990001793880203316 951 $aII.3. 175a(364.36 Mat)$b69437 L.M.$c364.36 951 $aII.3. 175(Varie coll. 179/33)$b86869 L.M.$cVarie coll. 959 $aBK 969 $aUMA 979 $aSIAV8$b10$c20040625$lUSA01$h1648 979 $aCOPAT2$b90$c20050118$lUSA01$h1229 979 $aCOPAT1$b90$c20051104$lUSA01$h1017 979 $aCOPAT1$b90$c20051104$lUSA01$h1017 979 $aFIORELLA$b90$c20081203$lUSA01$h1156 979 $aCHIARA$b90$c20100917$lUSA01$h1359 979 $aCHIARA$b90$c20100917$lUSA01$h1408 996 $aCome si diventa devianti$9278247 997 $aUNISA LEADER 02860nam 2200385 450 001 9910819822203321 005 20230807220945.0 010 $a80-210-7834-0 024 $a10.5817/CZ.MUNI.M210-7834-2015 035 $a(CKB)4100000001710669 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC6421687 035 $a(ceeol)ceeol838522 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000001710669 100 $a20210326d2015 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aChild welfare discourses and practices in the Czech lands $ethe segregation of Roma and disabled children during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries /$fVictoria Shmidt 210 1$aBrno :$cMasaryk University,$d[2015] 210 4$dİ2015 215 $a1 online resource (130 pages) 330 $aIn terms of methodological approaches, this book puts together eugenic studies and the segregation of Roma in order to indicate the new approaches to exploring the impact of the past on the current policies and routine practices in post-socialist world. It is possible to differentiate two camps of social scientists who practice historical method for reinforcing their attitudes towards the segregation of the Roma. In terms of retrospective analysis, both camps focuson the socialist period as a source of current issues regarding Roma, their discrimination and the intractability of practices. The main difference between these camps is the way of explaining the issue of segregation. Performed by applied scientists who study the strategies for well-balanced co-existence of the Czech and Roma, the first camp of scholars reproduces various essentialist concepts regarding Roma ? putting forward the insuperable difference between the ?white? majority and Roma as a call for more tolerant attitude. Utilising trans-historical disclosure of ?traditional? values, the other camp leads the sources of segregation to the inappropriate discourses disseminated amongst public as well as professionals. Catching others in the act of producing essentialist notion, these scholars often criticise the first camp but remain unable to construct the sustainable alternative to segregation. While the critical response to the first camp connects it with the previous practices and policies of segregation, the critical deconstruction of post-socialist trans-historis mensures the necessity of deeper contextualization in order to recognise options for sustainable integration. 606 $aChild welfare 615 0$aChild welfare. 676 $a362.7 700 $aShmidt$b Victoria$01549228 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910819822203321 996 $aChild welfare discourses and practices in the Czech lands$93930430 997 $aUNINA