LEADER 05697nam 2200697 450 001 9910819070603321 005 20230803205950.0 010 $a90-272-6950-5 035 $a(CKB)3710000000271901 035 $a(EBL)1829434 035 $a(SSID)ssj0001367833 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12565348 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001367833 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)11448322 035 $a(PQKB)11518462 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1829434 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1829434 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10966401 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL663024 035 $a(OCoLC)894555088 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000271901 100 $a20140728h20142014 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 00$aDiscourse segmentation in Romance languages /$fedited by Salvador Pons Borderi?a, University of Valencia/IULMA 210 1$aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia :$cJohn Benjamins Publishing Company,$d[2014] 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (282 p.) 225 1 $aPragmatics & Beyond New Series,$x0922-842X ;$vvolume 250 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-322-31742-9 311 $a90-272-5655-1 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aDiscourse Segmentation in Romance Languages; Editorial page; Title page; LCC data; Table of contents; Models of discourse segmentation in Romance languages; 1. Toward discourse segmentation; 1.1 In the beginning, there was the sentence; 1.2 Spoken language studies: from Romanticism to discourse segmentation; 1.3 The issue of the "new syntax"; 1.4 Prosody joins the party; 1.5 Summary; 2. Outline of the models in this volume; 2.1 Basel Model (BM); 2.2 Geneva Model (GM) and Fribourg Group Model (FM); 2.2.1 Geneva Model; 2.2.2 Fribourg Group Model (FM); 2.3 Val.Es.Co Model 327 $a2.4 Co-enunciation Model (CEM)2.5 Prominence Demarcation Model (PDM); 2.6 Basic Discourse Units Model (BDU); 3. Conclusions; References; The Basel Model for paragraph segmentation; 1. Introduction; 2. The basic conception behind the Basel Model; 2.1 The semantico-pragmatic organisation of the paragraph; 2.2 The meaning and nature of linguistic indications; 3. Communication Unit (CU) and Utterance (U); 3.1 The role of language; 3.2 The marking of Utterance boundaries; 4. Information Unit (IU); 4.1 The information structures of the Utterance 327 $a4.2 The hierarchico-informational structure in general: the nature, textual relevance and linguistic properties thereof4.3 The Nucleus and the Focus; 4.4 The Frame and the Appendix (in dialogue with Edoardo Lombardi Vallauri); 5. Conclusion. The information structure of the Utterance as interface between the linguistico-grammatical management and the textual management of discourse; References; The contribution of the Basel model to the description of polyfunctional discourse markers; 1. Introduction; 1.1 Accounting for discourse markers through Models of discourse units 327 $a1.2 Accounting for the polyfunctionality of discourse markers: From their syntactic and semantic properties to their discourse functions through information structure2. Syntactic and semantic properties of It. anche, Fr. aussi, Sp. tambie?n; 2.1 Focus adverbs; 2.1.1 Syntactic properties; 2.2.2 Semantic properties; 2.2 Connectives; 2.2.1 Additive connectives; 2.2.2 Consecutive connective; 3. Information status and textual properties of It. anche, Fr. aussi, Sp. tambie?n; 3.1 Anche/Aussi/Tambie?n in the Nuclear Unit of the Utterance; 3.1.1 Anche/Aussi/Tambie?n with additional linguistic material 327 $a3.1.2 Anche/Aussi/Tambie?n with no additional linguistic material3.2 Anche/Aussi/Tambie?n in the Frame Information Unit; 3.2.1 Anche/Aussi/Tambie?n with additional linguistic material; 3.2.2 Anche/Aussi/Tambie?n with no additional linguistic material; 3.3 Anche/Aussi/Tambie?n in the Appendix Information Unit; 3.3.1 Anche/Aussi/Tambie?n with additional linguistic material; 3.3.2 Anche/Aussi/Tambie?n with no additional linguistic material; 4. Concluding remarks; 4.1 The assets of the Basel Model of paragraph segmentation; 4.2 Cross-linguistic remarks; Corpora; References 327 $aParenthetical verbs as a challenge for discourse units 330 $aThis chapter presents an empirical study of the left periphery of Basic Discourse Units, viz. the linguistic segments that speakers and hearers use to interpret the discourse they are engaged in. A Basic Discourse Unit is bound by the mapping of a syntactic (dependency) structure and a major intonation unit, giving rise to different types of discourse units (congruent, syntax-bound, intonation-bound, regulatory). Focusing on the discourse units' Left Peripheral Elements, which are again defined in syntactic and prosodic terms, we show that they fulfil different discourse structuring roles. 410 0$aPragmatics & beyond ;$vv. 250. 606 $aRomance languages$xSyntax 606 $aRomance languages$xGrammar, Historical 606 $aRomance languages$xDiscourse analysis 606 $aRomance languages$xConversation analysis 615 0$aRomance languages$xSyntax. 615 0$aRomance languages$xGrammar, Historical. 615 0$aRomance languages$xDiscourse analysis. 615 0$aRomance languages$xConversation analysis. 676 $a440/.045 702 $aPons Borderi?a$b Salvador 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910819070603321 996 $aDiscourse segmentation in Romance languages$93999444 997 $aUNINA