LEADER 03451nam  2200673 a 450 
001 9910818989003321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-4623-0190-8
010   $a1-4552-9900-6
010   $a1-282-84664-7
010   $a1-4552-0240-1
010   $a9786612846649
035   $a(CKB)3170000000056072
035   $a(EBL)1606254
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001101266
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11985900
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001101266
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11066661
035   $a(PQKB)10005443
035   $a(OCoLC)568065991
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1606254
035   $a(IMF)1NPLEE2010001
035   $a(IMF)1NPLEA2010001
035   $a(EXLCZ)993170000000056072
100   $a20090805d2008      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aNepal $eselected issues /$fprepared by Shanaka J. Peiris
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aWashington, D.C. $cInternational Monetary Fund$d2008
215   $a1 online resource (28 p.)
225 1 $aIMF country report ;$vno. 08/182
300   $a"June 2008"--Cover.
300   $a"Prepared by a staff team of the International Monetary Fund as background documentation for the periodic consultation with the member country."
311   $a1-4552-0779-9 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references.
327   $aCover; Contents; I. Nepal-Considerations in the Choice of the Fiscal Stance; A. Introduction; B. Debt; Figure; Figure 1. External Debt, 2000-08; Figure 2. Public Debt, 2000-08; Figure 3. Debt Indicators, 2008; Table 1: Country Ratings, Public Debt Ratios, and Clubs 1/; Figure 4. Nepal: Debt and IIR; Table 2: Debt Thresholds for Nepal; C. Deficits; D. The Level and Composition of the Budget; Figure 5. Fiscal Indicators; Figure 6. Expenditure; E. Conclusion; Figure 7. Revenue and External Aid; Figure 8. GDP Growth, 2000-08; References
327   $aII. An Analysis of Systemic Risks in Nepal's Banking Sector in the Wake of the Global CrisisA. Introduction; B. Macro-Financial Linkages; C. Analysis of Systemic Stability of Banks; Table; Table 3. Simulation: Credit and Deposit Growth; Table 4. Selected Banking Crises in Asia; D. Conclusion; References; Appendix; 1. Nepal's State Banks
330 3 $aOver the past several years, Nepal has pursued a prudent fiscal policy, which has resulted in a significant reduction of public debt as a percentage of GDP. This paper reexamines the fiscal stance in Nepal in light of recent developments. The optimal level of the fiscal deficit is constrained by the need to achieve and sustain a debt-to-GDP ratio with an acceptable level of vulnerability to distress. The debt sustainability analyses (DSA) framework focuses on the net present value (NPV) of external public and publicly guaranteed debt, though public debt is also analyzed.
410  0$aIMF country report ;$vno. 08/182.
606   $aFinance$zNepal
606   $aBanks and banking$zNepal
607   $aNepal$xEconomic policy
607   $aNepal$xEconomic conditions
615  0$aFinance
615  0$aBanks and banking
676   $a332.152
700   $aPeiris$b Shanaka J$g(Shanaka Jayanath),$f1975-$01756860
712 02$aInternational Monetary Fund.
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910818989003321
996   $aNepal$94200609
997   $aUNINA