LEADER 02369nam 2200409 450 001 9910818796903321 005 20220831213539.0 010 $a1-4422-8058-1 035 $a(CKB)3840000000342580 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5314642 035 $a(EXLCZ)993840000000342580 100 $a20180322h20172017 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 00$aOversight and accountability in U.S. security sector assistance $eseeking return on investment /$fMelissa G. Dalton [et al.] 210 1$aWashington, District of Columbia ;$aLanham, Maryland :$cCenter for Strategic & International Studies :$cRowman & Littlefield,$d2017. 210 4$dİ2017 215 $a1 online resource (43 pages) 311 1 $a1-4422-8057-3 330 $aWith the range of security challenges confronting the United States in the 21st century, characterized by competition by both state and nonstate actors, the importance of working with allies and partners to address common challenges is paramount. Deeper examination of the relative effectiveness of U.S. security sector assistance and how it must nest in a broader foreign policy strategy, including good governance, human rights, and rule of law principles, is required. Improving oversight and accountability in U.S. security sector assistance with partners are at the core of ongoing security assistance reform efforts to ensure that U.S. foreign policy objectives are met and in accordance with U.S. interests and values. This report examines key areas in security sector programming and oversight where the U.S. Departments of Defense and State employ accountability mechanisms, with the goal of identifying ways to sharpen and knit together mechanisms for improving accountability and professionalism into a coherent approach for partner countries. 606 $aNational security$zUnited States 607 $aUnited States$2fast 615 0$aNational security 676 $a355.033073 701 $aShah$b Hijab$01703203 701 $aGreen$b Shannon N. $01651722 702 $aDalton$b Melissa 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910818796903321 996 $aOversight and accountability in U.S. security sector assistance$94088229 997 $aUNINA