LEADER 05560nam 2200697Ia 450 001 9910818763703321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-281-80549-1 010 $a9786611805494 010 $a0-8213-7716-7 024 7 $a10.1596/978-0-8213-7714-7 035 $a(CKB)1000000000705325 035 $a(EBL)459854 035 $a(OCoLC)297562639 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000085174 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11119556 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000085174 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10022970 035 $a(PQKB)10304771 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC459854 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL459854 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10257221 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL180549 035 $a(The World Bank)bk17714 035 $a(US-djbf)bk17714 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000705325 100 $a20080331d2008 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aurcn||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 00$aAnnual review of development effectiveness$h2008$iShared global challenges 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aWashington, D.C. $cWorld Bank$d2008 215 $a1 online resource (126 pages) 225 1 $aIndependent Evaluation Group Studies 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-8213-7714-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aContents; Abbreviations; Acknowledgments; Foreword; Executive Summary; Management Comments: Summary; Chairman's Summary: Committee on Development Effectiveness (CODE); Evaluation Snapshot in Selected Languages; 1 Introduction; PART I: TRACKING BANK PERFORMANCE; 2 Development Outcomes: Indicators of Performance; Measuring Project Performance: Trends from IEG Monitoring; Figure 2.1 Project Performance Has Improved over the Medium Term; Box 2.1 What Does a Satisfactory Project Look Like? Illustrations of Development Impact; Figure 2.2 Trends in Sectoral Performance 327 $aTable 2.1 Distribution of Project Ratings Moved Up the Scale in FY03-07Project Outcomes in Fiscal 2007 Data; Figure 2.3 Africa's Projects Have Improved Substantially but Still Lag Behind Other Regions; Table 2.2 Disconnect between the Bank's Self-Ratings and IEG Ratings Increased Dramatically in FY07; How It Adds Up: Outcomes of Bank Country Programs; Figure 2.4 CAEs Show Three-Fifths with Outcomes Moderately Satisfactory or Better; Table 2.3 Summary of CAE Ratings, FY98-08; Box 2.2 What Does a Satisfactory Country Program Look Like? 327 $aFigure 2.5 CASCR Reviews Indicate That Bank Programs in MICs Outperform Those in LICsTable 2.4 Summary of CASCR Review Ratings, FY03-08; 3 Underpinning Impact-M&E and Results Management; Monitoring and Evaluation Systems at the Project Level; Figure 3.1 Projects with Higher Outcome Ratings Have Better M&E Ratings; Figure 3.2 M&E Is Rated Modest or Lower in Two-Thirds of ICR Reviews; Box 3.1 M&E Findings and Recommendations in Recent IEG Evaluations; Box 3.2 Armenia Joint Country Portfolio Performance Review; Country-Level M&E: Early Evidence from Results-Based CASs 327 $aBox 3.3 Results Measurement and Monitoring in LICUSManaging Global Programs and Partnerships: An Emerging Agenda; Box 3.4 Use of CAS Results Frameworks in Country Program Management; Improving Our Understanding of Causality: The Use of Impact Evaluations; Figure 3.3 About 70 Percent of Ongoing Evaluations Are Clustered in Five Areas; Figure 3.4 Nearly Two-Thirds of Ongoing Evaluations Are Located in Two Regions; Monitoring Institutional Effectiveness; 4 Lessons and Opportunities; Directions for the Overall Bank Agenda; Practical Lessons for the Near Term 327 $aPART II: SHARED GLOBAL CHALLENGES-LESSONS FROM THE BANK'S EXPERIENCE5 The Challenge of Global Public Goods; Box 5.1 Key Characteristics of Global Public Goods; 6 Using the Bank's Country-Based Model to Foster Global Public Goods: Does It Work?; How It Works in Theory-the Bank's Strategic Setting for Fostering Global Public Goods; Box 6.1 Brazil: A Best Practice in Integrating GPG Themes in Country Strategies; Box 6.2 Emerging Good Practice from the Regions; Country Programs in Practice-from Strategy to Action; Figure 6.1 Bank Expenditures on Main GPG Themes 327 $aFigure 6.2 IBRD and IDA Lending for Main GPG Themes 330 3 $aFor the World Bank and its partners, the ever-present test is to deliver results-to lift people out of poverty and promote socially and environmentally sustainable development. Achieving such success in any individual country is increasingly intertwined with making progress on shared global challenges. The 2008 Annual Review of Development Effectiveness, an independent evaluation, presents evidence on the Bank's efforts in two important and connected areas: tracking outcomes of Bank projects and country programs; and progress in fostering global public goods, such as protecting the earth's climate and preventing the spread of dangerous communicable diseases. 410 0$aIndependent Evaluation Group Studies 410 0$aWorld Bank e-Library. 606 $aEconomic development projects$xFinance$xEvaluation 606 $aLoans, Foreign$zDeveloping countries$vStatistics 615 0$aEconomic development projects$xFinance$xEvaluation. 615 0$aLoans, Foreign 676 $a338 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910818763703321 996 $aAnnual review of development effectiveness$94188171 997 $aUNINA