LEADER 03960nam 22007572 450 001 9910818476603321 005 20151005020622.0 010 $a1-139-06333-2 010 $a1-107-21519-6 010 $a1-283-11098-9 010 $a9786613110985 010 $a1-139-07561-6 010 $a0-511-97350-0 010 $a1-139-07787-2 010 $a1-139-06985-3 010 $a1-139-08016-4 010 $a1-139-08244-2 035 $a(CKB)2670000000088892 035 $a(EBL)691899 035 $a(OCoLC)726734781 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000526705 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11329899 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000526705 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10521211 035 $a(PQKB)11021226 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511973505 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC691899 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000088892 100 $a20101011d2011|||| uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aWriting history in international criminal trials /$fRichard Ashby Wilson$b[electronic resource] 210 1$aCambridge :$cCambridge University Press,$d2011. 215 $a1 online resource (xiv, 257 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 $a0-521-13831-0 311 $a0-521-19885-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aMachine generated contents note: 1. Assessing court histories of mass crimes; 2. What does the 'international' actually mean for international criminal trials?; 3. Contrasting evidence: international and common law approaches to expert testimony; 4. Does history have any legal relevance in international criminal trials?; 5. From monumental history to micro-histories; 6. Exoneration and mitigation in defense histories; 7. Misjudging Rwandan society and history at the international criminal tribunal for Rwanda; 8. Permanent justice: the international criminal court; 9. Conclusion: new directions in international criminal trials. 330 $aWhy do international criminal tribunals write histories of the origins and causes of armed conflicts? Richard Ashby Wilson conducted research with judges, prosecutors, defense attorneys and expert witnesses in three international criminal tribunals to understand how law and history are combined in the courtroom. Historical testimony is now an integral part of international trials, with prosecutors and defense teams using background testimony to pursue decidedly legal objectives. In the Slobodan Milos?evic? trial, the prosecution sought to demonstrate special intent to commit genocide by reference to a long-standing animus, nurtured within a nationalist mindset. For their part, the defense called historical witnesses to undermine charges of superior responsibility, and to mitigate the sentence by representing crimes as reprisals. Although legal ways of knowing are distinct from those of history, the two are effectively combined in international trials in a way that challenges us to rethink the relationship between law and history. 606 $aCrimes against humanity 606 $aWar crimes 606 $aProsecution 606 $aEvidence, Documentary 606 $aPolitical violence$xHistory 606 $aCivil war$xHistory 606 $aWar$xHistory 615 0$aCrimes against humanity. 615 0$aWar crimes. 615 0$aProsecution. 615 0$aEvidence, Documentary. 615 0$aPolitical violence$xHistory. 615 0$aCivil war$xHistory. 615 0$aWar$xHistory. 676 $a341.6/9 686 $aLAW051000$2bisacsh 700 $aWilson$b Richard Ashby$f1964-$01661932 801 0$bUkCbUP 801 1$bUkCbUP 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910818476603321 996 $aWriting history in international criminal trials$94018153 997 $aUNINA