LEADER 03755nam  2200625 a 450 
001 9910818094703321
005 20200520144314.0
010   $a1-282-16092-3
010   $a9786612160929
010   $a90-272-9615-4
035   $a(CKB)1000000000555466
035   $a(OCoLC)179163946
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebrary10041618
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC622984
035   $a(EXLCZ)991000000000555466
100   $a20020528d2002      uy         0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|||||||||||
181   $ctxt$2rdacontent
182   $cc$2rdamedia
183   $acr$2rdacarrier
200 10$aPoint of view and grammar $estructural patterns of subjectivity in American English conversation /$fJoanne Scheibman
205   $a1st ed.
210   $aAmsterdam ;$aPhiladelphia $cJohn Benjamins Pub.$dc2002
215   $a1 online resource (202 p.)
225 1 $aStudies in discourse and grammar,$x0928-8929 ;$vv. 11
311   $a1-58811-232-2 
311   $a90-272-2621-0 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. [177]-182) and index.
327   $aPoint of View and Grammar -- Editorial page -- Title page -- LCC page -- Dedication page -- Contents -- Acknowledgements -- List of tables -- Chapter 1 Linguistic subjectivity and usage-based linguistics -- Notes -- Chapter 2 Classification and coding of conversational data -- Notes -- Chapter 3 Patterns of subjectivity in person and predicate -- Notes -- Chapter 4 The evaluative character of relational clauses -- Notes -- Chapter 5 Summaries and conclusions -- Notes -- Appendix A: Transcription symbols -- Appendix B: Intermediate function verbs in the database -- References -- Index -- The series STUDIES IN DISCOURSE AND GRAMMAR (SiDaG).
330   $aThis book proposes that subjective expression shapes grammatical and lexical patterning in American English conversation. Analyses of structural and functional properties of English conversational utterances indicate that the most frequent combinations of subject, tense, and verb type are those that are used by speakers to personalize their contributions, not to present unmediated descriptions of the world. These findings are informed by current research and practices in linguistics which argue that the emergence, or conventionalization, of linguistic structure is related to the frequency with which speakers use expressions in discourse. The use of conversational data in grammatical analysis illustrates the local and contingent nature of grammar in use and also raises theoretical questions concerning the coherence of linguistic categories, the viability of maintaining a distinction between semantic and pragmatic meaning in analytical practice, and the structural and social interplay of speaker point of view and participant interaction in discourse.
410  0$aStudies in discourse and grammar ;$vv. 11.
606   $aEnglish language$xSpoken English$zUnited States
606   $aEnglish language$xSocial aspects$zUnited States
606   $aEnglish language$zUnited States$xGrammar
606   $aEnglish language$xDiscourse analysis
606   $aSpeech acts (Linguistics)
606   $aInterpersonal relations
606   $aConversation
615  0$aEnglish language$xSpoken English
615  0$aEnglish language$xSocial aspects
615  0$aEnglish language$xGrammar.
615  0$aEnglish language$xDiscourse analysis.
615  0$aSpeech acts (Linguistics)
615  0$aInterpersonal relations.
615  0$aConversation.
676   $a401/.41
700   $aScheibman$b Joanne$01635894
801  0$bMiAaPQ
801  1$bMiAaPQ
801  2$bMiAaPQ
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910818094703321
996   $aPoint of View and Grammar$93976895
997   $aUNINA