LEADER 05548nam 2200673 450 001 9910818006703321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-118-89915-6 010 $a1-118-89899-0 035 $a(CKB)2550000001184192 035 $a(EBL)1629186 035 $a(OCoLC)868280019 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1629186 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL1629186 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10827583 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL563512 035 $a(OCoLC)870587280 035 $a(PPN)191721050 035 $a(EXLCZ)992550000001184192 100 $a20140125h20142014 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 00$aInformation evaluation /$fedited by Philippe Capet, Thomas Delavallade ; Jean-Charles Pomerol, series editor 210 1$aLondon, [England] ;$aHoboken, New Jersey :$cJohn Wiley & Sons, Incorporation,$d2014. 210 4$dİ2014 215 $a1 online resource (338 p.) 225 0 $aInformation Systems, Web and Pervasive Computing Series 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-84821-659-9 311 $a1-306-32261-8 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references at the end of each chapters and index. 327 $aCover; Title Page; Contents; Foreword; Introduction; Chapter 1. Information: Philosophical Analysis and Strategic Applications; 1.1. Introduction; 1.2. State of the art in philosophy; 1.2.1. History; 1.2.2. Information at the crossroads between epistemology and philosophy of language; 1.3. Information warfare; 1.3.1. The role of falsehood and of intentions; 1.3.2. Deception, simulation and dissimulation; 1.3.3. Addressees of information or the art of communicating; 1.3.4. Information warfare as a play on beliefs; 1.3.5. Disinformation and associated notions 327 $a1.4. Conclusion. Comprehending information in order to evaluate it1.5. Bibliography; Chapter 2. Epistemic Trust; 2.1. Introduction; 2.2. What is social epistemology?; 2.3. History of the discipline; 2.4. Social epistemology and externalism; 2.5. Realism and constructivism in social epistemology; 2.6. Believing other people; 2.7. Reductionism and antireductionism; 2.8. Trust and communication; 2.9. Conclusion; 2.10. Bibliography; Chapter 3. The Fundamentals of Intelligence; 3.1. Introduction; 3.2. Information evaluation in the language of intelligence 327 $a3.2.1. A context which is not clearly defined, open to multiple interpretations3.2.2. An informational model historically based on the evaluation of information and of sources; 3.3. Attempt to formalize generic models appropriate for the new issues facing the intelligence services; 3.3.1. Functional analysis as a support for definition; 3.3.2. Paradigm shifts; 3.3.3. Attempt at a rigorous definition of intelligence; 3.4. Conclusion; 3.5. Bibliography; Chapter 4. Information Evaluation in the Military Domain: Doc; 4.1. Introduction; 4.2. Presentation of the existing situation 327 $a4.2.1. Information evaluation in the intelligence cycle4.2.2. Reliability and credibility of information; 4.3. Illustrative scenario with multi-sourced information; 4.4. From an inaccurate definition to an attractive but unusable concept; 4.4.1. Estimation of reliability; 4.4.2. Estimation of credibility; 4.4.3. Combining dimensions - what is the comparability of the ratings?; 4.4.4. Raw data, enriched intelligence - can information evaluation qualify everything?; 4.5. A few suggested refinements to information evaluation techniques; 4.6. Conclusion and future prospects; 4.7. Bibliography 327 $aChapter 5. Multidimensional Approach to Reliability Evaluation of Information Sources5.1. Introduction; 5.2. Multi-criteria aggregation by the Choquet integral: application to the evaluation of the reliability of sources; 5.2.1. Multi-criteria decision support; 5.2.2. Multi-Attribute Utility Theory; 5.2.3. Concepts of measurement and construction of utility functions; 5.2.4. Aggregation function A: limitations of the weighted sum; 5.2.5. The Choquet integral; 5.2.6. Determination of the aggregation function A; 5.2.7. Multi-level preference models 327 $a5.2.8. Estimation of a degree of reliability via the multi-criteria approach 330 $aDuring the reception of a piece of information, we are never passive. Depending on its origin and content, from our personal beliefs and convictions, we bestow upon this piece of information, spontaneously or after reflection, a certain amount of confidence. Too much confidence shows a degree of naivety, whereas an absolute lack of it condemns us as being paranoid. These two attitudes are symmetrically detrimental, not only to the proper perception of this information but also to its use. Beyond these two extremes, each person generally adopts an intermediate position when faced with the recep 410 0$aISTE 606 $aManagement information systems 606 $aAccounting 606 $aInformation measurement$xMathematical models 615 0$aManagement information systems. 615 0$aAccounting. 615 0$aInformation measurement$xMathematical models. 676 $a658.4038011 701 $aCapet$b Philippe$01674324 701 $aDelavallade$b Thomas$01674325 701 $aPomerol$b Jean-Charles$0935693 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910818006703321 996 $aInformation evaluation$94039043 997 $aUNINA