LEADER 04538nam 2200529 450 001 9910817257403321 005 20230102051132.0 010 $a94-6166-258-0 035 $a(CKB)4100000007109520 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL5568186 035 $a(OCoLC)1059555408 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC5568186 035 $a(MdBmJHUP)musev2_109377 035 $a(EXLCZ)994100000007109520 100 $a20181219d2018 uy 0 101 0 $ager 135 $aurcnu|||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aWissensordnungen des Rechts im Wandel $epa?pstlicher Jurisdiktionsprimat und Zo?libat zwischen 1000 und 1215 /$fvon Stephan Dusil 210 1$a[Place of publication not identified] :$cLeuven University Press,$d[2018] 210 4$dİ2018 215 $a1 online resource (642 pages) 311 $a94-6270-133-4 311 $a94-6270-152-0 327 $6880-01$aIntro; ?Inhaltsverzeichnis; ?Vorwort; ?Einleitung; ?Kapitel 1. Wissen u?ber Jurisdiktionsprimat und Zo?libat. Fragestellung und methodischer Ansatz; ?1. Zum Begriff des Wissens; ?a). Ausgangsbefunde: Ansa?tze in den Geisteswissenschaften; ?b). Zuspitzung: Rechtswissen in der historischen Kanonistik; ?2. Untersuchungsfelder: Pa?pstlicher Jurisdiktionsprimat und Zo?libat; ?a). Tu es Petrus: Der Jurisdiktionsprimat des Bischofs von Rom im mittelalterlichen Kirchenrecht; ?(1). Ausgangspunkt: Der Jurisdiktionsprimat im heutigen Kirchenrecht 327 $a?Kapitel 2. Ausgangspunkt: Kanonessammlungen im 11. und 12. Jahrhundert?1. Quellenkunde: Vorgratianische Kanonessammlungen; ?2. Primus liber continet: Die Darstellung des Jurisdiktionsprimats und des Zo?libats in vorgratianischen Sammlungen; ?a). primae sedis episcopus aut princeps sacerdotum? Der Jurisdiktionsprimat zwischen episkopal-dezentraler und ro?misch-primatialer Perspektive; ?(1). Das Decretum Burchards von Worms; ?(2). Die Collectio 74 Titulorum; ?(3). Die Panormia; ?(4). Die Collectio Canonum Deusdedits; ?(5). Wissensproduktion im Wandel: Resu?mierende Beobachtungen 330 $aFascinating insights into the origins of canon law as an academic discipline and legal knowledge in the High Middle AgesThe study examines the order of medieval legal knowledge in pre-Gratian collections, the Decretum Gratiani, and the glosses and summaries accompanying the decree. The focus is therefore on canonical knowledge, which changed fundamentally between 1000 and 1215: while ecclesiastical legal rules were stored linearly in collections of canons around 1000, they were linked to form complex legal knowledge in the 12th century. On the basis of a comprehensive evaluation of the handwritten tradition, the change in legal knowledge is analyzed using the papal primacy of jurisdiction and celibacy. In addition, the study shows the influence of such liberal and rhetoric in the ordering of church norms. The study thus provides a fascinating insight into the emergence of canon law and at the same time shows the diversity and complexity of legal knowledge in the High Middle Ages.Between 1000 and 1215, the knowledge of canon law changed fundamentally. Although ecclesiastic rules of law had been linearly collected by 1000, they had evolved into complex, highly interlinked carriers of knowledge by 1215. By carefully examining manuscript transmission, this book elucidates the evolution of legal knowledge, taking papal jurisdictional primacy and clerical celibacy as an illustrative example. Furthermore, it shows the influence theartes liberalesand rhetoric had on the organization of canon law. This study thus offers fascinating insights into the origins of canon law as an academic discipline, thereby also demonstrating the diversity and multi-layeredness of legal knowledge in the High Middle Ages. 330 $aFascinating insights into the origins of canon law as an academic discipline and legal knowledge in the High Middle Ages. 606 $aPopes$xPrimacy 606 $aCelibacy (Canon law) 606 $aCanon law$xHistory$yTo 1500 608 $aHistory. 608 $aElectronic books. 615 0$aPopes$xPrimacy. 615 0$aCelibacy (Canon law) 615 0$aCanon law$xHistory 676 $a262.13 700 $aDusil$b Stephan$01157277 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910817257403321 996 $aWissensordnungen des Rechts im Wandel$93977427 997 $aUNINA