LEADER 04585nam 2200637Ia 450 001 9910816923103321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-4623-1138-5 010 $a1-4527-8741-7 010 $a9786612842535 010 $a1-4518-7178-3 010 $a1-282-84253-6 035 $a(CKB)3170000000055203 035 $a(EBL)1608176 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000941480 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11473995 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000941480 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10963971 035 $a(PQKB)11134282 035 $a(OCoLC)680613619 035 $a(IMF)WPIEE2009031 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC1608176 035 $a(EXLCZ)993170000000055203 100 $a20041202d2009 uf 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aIn search of WTO trade effects $epreferential trade agreements promote trade strongly, but unevenly /$fprepared by Theo S. Eicher and Christian Henn 205 $a1st ed. 210 $a[Washington D.C.] $cInternational Monetary Fund$d2009 215 $a1 online resource (32 p.) 225 1 $aIMF working paper ;$vWP/09/31 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a1-4519-1614-0 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references. 327 $aContents; I. Introduction; II. Data; III. Extending the Empirical Framework to Account for Individual PTA Effects; A. Results: WTO Trade Impact After Controlling for Multilateral Resistance and Individual PTA Effects (Hierarchical, Mutually Exclusive WTO Coding); B. Hierarchical, Mutually Exclusive Coding and SW's "Implicit Industrialized PTA Dummy"; IV. Individual PTA Effects, Multilateral Resistance, and Unobserved Bilateral Heterogeneity 327 $aA. WTO Trade Impact: Controlling for Multilateral Resistance, Unobserved Bilateral Heterogeneity and Individual PTA Effects (Hierarchical/Mutually Exclusive WTO Coding)V. Individual PTA Trade Effects, Multilateral Resistance, and Unobserved Bilateral Hetergeneity (Mutually Inclusive WTO Coding); A. WTO Trade Impact: Controlling for Multilateral Resistance, Unobserved Bilateral Heterogeneity and Individual PTA Effects (Mutually Inclusive WTO Coding); VI. Individual PTA Trade Effects: Sensitivity to Unobserved Bilateral Heterogeneity and Multilateral Resistance Controls; VII. Conclusion 327 $aReferencesTables; 1. WTO and PTA Effects (Hierarchical, Mutually Exclusive Coding); 1.a. Raw Regression Output; 2. WTO and PTA Effects (Inclusive Coding); Appendices; A1. Membership in considered Preferential Trading Arrangements; A2. Bilateral Preferential Trade Agreements considered in BilateralPTAmxt; A3. List of Countries in sample and year of WTO accession; B1. De jure coding. WTO and PTA Effects (Hierarchical, Mutually Exclusive Coding); B1.a. Raw Regression Output De jure Coding; B2. De jure coding. WTO and PTA Effects (Inclusive Coding) 330 3 $aThe literature measuring the impact of Preferential Trade Agreements (PTA) and WTO membership on trade flows has produced remarkably diverse results. Rose's (2004) seminal paper reports a range of specifications that show no WTO effects, but Subramanian and Wei (2007) contend that he does not fully control for multilateral resistance (which could bias WTO estimates). Subramanian and Wei (2007) address multilateral resistance comprehensively to report strong WTO trade effects for industrialized countries but do not account for unobserved bilateral heterogeneity (which could inflate WTO estimates). We unify these two approaches by accounting for both multilateral resistance and unobserved bilateral heterogeneity, while also allowing for individual trade effects of PTAs. WTO effects vanish and remain insignificant throughout once multilateral resistance, unobserved bilateral heterogeneity, and individual PTA effects are introduced. The result is robust to the use of alternative definitions and coding conventions for WTO membership that have been employed by Rose (2004), Tomz et al. (2007), or by Subramanian and Wei's (2007). 410 0$aIMF working paper ;$vWP/09/31. 606 $aTerms of trade 606 $aTariff preferences 615 0$aTerms of trade. 615 0$aTariff preferences. 676 $a382.3;382.30973 700 $aEicher$b Theo S$01176252 701 $aHenn$b Christian$f1978-$01760029 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910816923103321 996 $aIn search of WTO trade effects$94198778 997 $aUNINA