LEADER 03916nam 2200709 a 450 001 9910816800103321 005 20200520144314.0 010 $a1-107-12048-9 010 $a1-280-42985-2 010 $a0-511-17637-6 010 $a0-511-04096-2 010 $a0-511-15714-2 010 $a0-511-32552-5 010 $a0-511-49402-5 010 $a0-511-04611-1 035 $a(CKB)1000000000002214 035 $a(EBL)201711 035 $a(OCoLC)559091656 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000140231 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)11139485 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000140231 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10050987 035 $a(PQKB)11605252 035 $a(UkCbUP)CR9780511494024 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC201711 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL201711 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10014585 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL42985 035 $a(EXLCZ)991000000000002214 100 $a20010614d2002 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur||||||||||| 181 $ctxt$2rdacontent 182 $cc$2rdamedia 183 $acr$2rdacarrier 200 10$aDiversity and self-determination in international law /$fKaren Knop 205 $a1st ed. 210 $aCambridge, UK ;$aNew York $cCambridge University Press$d2002 215 $a1 online resource (xxii, 434 pages) $cdigital, PDF file(s) 225 1 $aCambridge studies in international and comparative law 300 $aTitle from publisher's bibliographic system (viewed on 05 Oct 2015). 311 0 $a0-521-06740-5 311 0 $a0-521-78178-7 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references (p. 382-420) and index. 327 $aPart I. Self-determination in post-Cold War international legal literature -- 1. The question of norm-type -- 2. Interpretation and identity -- 3. Pandemonium, interpretation and participation -- Part II. Self-determination interpreted in practice: the challenge of culture -- 4. The canon of self-determination -- 5. Developing texts -- Part III. Self-determination interpreted in practice: the challenge of gender -- 6. Women and self-determination in Europe after World War I -- 7. Women and self-determination in United Nations trust territories -- 8. Indigenous women and self-determination. 330 $aThe emergence of new states and independence movements after the Cold War has intensified the long-standing disagreement among international lawyers over the right of self-determination, especially the right of secession. Knop shifts the discussion from the articulation of the right to its interpretation. She argues that the practice of interpretation involves and illuminates a problem of diversity raised by the exclusion of many of the groups that self-determination most affects. Distinguishing different types of exclusion and the relationships between them reveals the deep structures, biases and stakes in the decisions and scholarship on self-determination. Knop's analysis also reveals that the leading cases have grappled with these embedded inequalities. Challenges by colonies, ethnic nations, indigenous peoples, women and others to the gender and cultural biases of international law emerge as integral to the interpretation of self-determination historically, as do attempts by judges and other institutional interpreters to meet these challenges. 410 0$aCambridge studies in international and comparative law (Cambridge, England : 1996) ;$v20. 606 $aSelf-determination, National 606 $aWomen (International law) 606 $aInternational law 615 0$aSelf-determination, National. 615 0$aWomen (International law) 615 0$aInternational law. 676 $a341.26 700 $aKnop$b Karen$f1960-$0282002 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910816800103321 996 $aDiversity and self-determination in international law$9673237 997 $aUNINA