LEADER 08061oam 2200769I 450 001 9910816551003321 005 20240516212739.0 010 $a1-136-51031-1 010 $a1-283-52028-1 010 $a9786613832733 010 $a0-203-14737-5 010 $a1-136-51032-X 024 7 $a10.4324/9780203147375 035 $a(CKB)2670000000230921 035 $a(EBL)987963 035 $a(OCoLC)804661523 035 $a(SSID)ssj0000695420 035 $a(PQKBManifestationID)12265253 035 $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0000695420 035 $a(PQKBWorkID)10675052 035 $a(PQKB)10240104 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC987963 035 $a(Au-PeEL)EBL987963 035 $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10588994 035 $a(CaONFJC)MIL383273 035 $a(OCoLC)840583214 035 $a(FINmELB)ELB135060 035 $a(EXLCZ)992670000000230921 100 $a20180706d2012 uy 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $ctxt 182 $cc 183 $acr 200 10$aEU external relations law and the European neighbourhood policy $ea paradigm for coherence /$fBart Van Vooren 205 $a1st ed. 210 1$aLondon ;$aNew York :$cRoutledge :$cTaylor & Francis,$d2012. 215 $a1 online resource (713 p.) 225 1 $aRoutledge research in EU law 225 0$aRoutledge research in EU law 300 $aDescription based upon print version of record. 311 $a0-415-72450-3 311 $a0-415-67466-2 320 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index. 327 $aCover; Title Page; Copyright; Contents; List of Tables and Figures; Table of Cases; Table of EU Instruments; Acknowledgements; Introduction; 1. A Legal History of Fragmentation and Coherence in EU External Action; 1.1 Introduction; 1.2 The Development of EPC 'in the Shadow' of the EEC; 1.3 The Maastricht Treaty: A Watershed for 'EU' External Relations?; 1.4 From Amsterdam to Lisbon: The CFSP's Claim to Legal Independence; 1.5 The Lisbon Treaty and Coherence in EU External Relations; 1.6 Conclusion: The Integration-Law-Policy Dynamic in EU External Relations 327 $a2. A Theoretical Framework for Coherence in EU External Relations Law and Policy2.1 Introduction; 2.2 Coherence: A Constitutional Principle of EU External Relations Law; 2.3 Coherence: A Constitutional Principle with Three Levels - Art 21.3 TEU; 2.4 Conclusion; 3. Coherence of EU and Member State External Action: Duty of Loyalty; 3.1 Introduction: Exclusion, Cooperation and Coherence; 3.2 The Common Foundation of Pre-Emption and Cooperation: Art 4.3 TEU; 3.3 Coherence Through Pre-Emption Tested in EU Readmission Policy 327 $a3.4 Coherence Through the Duty of Cooperation Tested in EU Aviation Policy3.5 Jurisprudence on the Duty of Cooperation: Towards De Facto Pre-Emption?; 3.6 Conclusion: The Loyalty Obligation and EU-Member State Coherence; 4. Coherence Across Divided Union Competences in the TEU and TFEU; 4.1 Introduction: The Principles of Conferral and Coherence; 4.2 Delimiting Union Powers; 4.3 Delimiting the CFSP within the Union; 4.4 Conclusion; 5. Coherence and Soft Law in EU External Relations: ENP as a Paradigm; 5.1 Introduction; 5.2 Soft Law in EU External Relations: A Functional Framework of Study 327 $a5.3 The Hybrid Legal Nature of the European Neighbourhood Policy5.4 Soft Instruments During the ENP's 'Conceptualization Phase' (2002-2003); 5.5 Soft Instruments During the ENP's 'Execution Phase' (2003-2005); 5.6 The ENP's 'Mature Phase': Towards an Equilibrium Between Soft and Hard Law? (2005-...); 5.7 Legitimacy of Soft Law in EU External Relations: The Equilibrium between Legality and Utility; 5.8 Conclusion; 6. Coherence as Policy Synergy in the ENP; 6.1 Introduction; 6.2 The ENP as a Coherent Human Security Policy; 6.3 Research Design 327 $a6.4 Coherence in External Projection of Fundamental Values6.5 Coherence in Joint Ownership; 6.6 Coherence between Macro and Meso-Policies: Energy in the ENP; 6.7 Conclusion; 7. Conclusion: The ENP, a Paradigm for Coherence?; 7.1 Introduction; 7.2 Coherence in EU External Relations Law and Policy; 7.3 Policy Recommendations: Coherent and Effective EU External Relations; Annex I: Research Design Chapter 6; Annex II: Correlation Matrix of ENP Action Plans' Policy Sections; Bibliography; Index 330 $a"During the 1970s, the EU member states made fledgling attempts to coordinate their foreign policies in the form of intergovernmental structures called European Political Cooperation. These initial efforts towards integrating national foreign policies were of limited success, as was evident from the failure to respond effectively to the infamous hostage situation in Tehran, or the lacklustre European response to the USSR invasion of Afghanistan over Christmas 1979. This dynamic has continued in the last decades of the twentieth century and into the twenty-first. The first ever European Security Strategy of 2003 was drawn up after deep European disagreement over the Iraq war. The big bang-enlargement of May 2004 prompted the need for a novel policy that draws together EU and member state action to effectively deal with the EUs new neighbours: the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP).This book offers a thorough legal and policy examination of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) as latest grand experiment in achieving coherent external relations for the Union. The book draws on legal and political scholarship to attain a definition of coherence in EU external relations. It argues that traditional definitions such as vertical or horizontal coherence are insufficient and sets out a new definition in order to more accurately capture the reality of EU external relations. The book goes on to look in depth at the ENP, arguing that the innovative nature of the ENP in regard to coherence lies beyond the narrowly defined legal sphere, but stems mostly from its hybrid composition of hard legal, soft legal and non-legal policy instruments"--$cProvided by publisher. 330 $a"The European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) is a recent example of an external EU policy drawn up explicitly with the objective of achieving coherence in the external policies of the EU and its Member States. Positioning the ENP in the legal-historical context of political union, this book explains why coherence has become a substantive issue in EU external relations, and why law is integral to attaining the ever-enigmatic single voice of the European Union. The text examines the role of EU external relations law in attaining a coherent neighbourhood policy and goes on to undertake an in depth analysis of the ENP, arguing that the innovative nature of the ENP in regard to coherence lies beyond the narrowly defined legal sphere, and stems primarily from its hybrid composition of hard legal, soft legal and non-legal policy instruments. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach by integrating elements of law, history and political science, EU External Relations Law and the European Neighbourhood Policy is unique in its approach to the subject. This book will be of particular interest to academics and students of EU Law, Political Science, History and International Relations as well as to practitioners engaged in the process of drafting coherent external policy"--$cProvided by publisher. 410 0$aRoutledge research in EU law. 606 $aInternational and municipal law$zEuropean Union countries 606 $aInternational cooperation$zEuropean Union countries 607 $aEuropean Union countries$xForeign relations$xLaw and legislation 615 0$aInternational and municipal law 615 0$aInternational cooperation 676 $a341.242/2 686 $aLAW000000$aLAW051000$aPOL011000$2bisacsh 700 $aVan Vooren$b Bart.$01710147 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910816551003321 996 $aEU external relations law and the European neighbourhood policy$94100519 997 $aUNINA