LEADER 03366oam  2200757I  450 
001 9910816431603321
005 20190503073415.0
010   $a0-262-31776-1
010   $a0-262-31775-3
035   $a(CKB)2550000001123442
035   $a(EBL)3339688
035   $a(SSID)ssj0001004103
035   $a(PQKBManifestationID)11565684
035   $a(PQKBTitleCode)TC0001004103
035   $a(PQKBWorkID)11056407
035   $a(PQKB)10328587
035   $a(StDuBDS)EDZ0000234256
035   $a(CaBNVSL)mat06658632
035   $a(IDAMS)0b00006481f4a55f
035   $a(IEEE)6658632
035   $a(OCoLC)859536208
035   $a(MdBmJHUP)muse29042
035   $a(OCoLC)859536208$z(OCoLC)859383150$z(OCoLC)881289027
035   $a(OCoLC-P)859536208
035   $a(MaCbMITP)9742
035   $a(Au-PeEL)EBL3339688
035   $a(CaPaEBR)ebr10773247
035   $a(CaONFJC)MIL525159
035   $a(OCoLC)939263800
035   $a(MiAaPQ)EBC3339688
035   $a(EXLCZ)992550000001123442
100   $a20131007d2013      uy             0
101 0 $aeng
135   $aur|n|---|||||
181   $ctxt
182   $cc
183   $acr
200 10$aResearch misconduct policy in biomedicine $ebeyond the bad-apple approach /$fBarbara K. Redman
210  1$aCambridge, Massachusetts :$cThe MIT Press,$d[2013]
215   $a1 online resource (209 p.)
225 1 $aBasic bioethics
300   $aDescription based upon print version of record.
311   $a0-262-01981-7 
311   $a1-299-93908-2 
320   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
327   $aContents; Series Foreword; Introduction; 1 Has Something Important Happened to Scientific Ethics?; 2 Will Approaches from the Psychosocial and Organizational Sciences Improve Research Misconduct Regulation?; 3 What Combination of Regulatory Tools Will Minimize Research Misconduct?; 4 Are Current Publication Standards Protecting the Integrity of the Scientific Record?; 5 Lessons from Clinical Case Studies in Research Misconduct; 6 Research Misconduct Policy, Its Evolution and Culture of Morality; 7 The Unity of Moral Science; References; Index; Basic Bioethics
330   $aFederal regulations that govern research misconduct in biomedicine have not been able to prevent an ongoing series of high-profile cases of fabricating, falsifying, or plagiarizing scientific research. In this book, Barbara Redman looks critically at current research misconduct policy and proposes a new approach that emphasizes institutional context and improved oversight.
410  0$aBasic bioethics.
606   $aMedicine$xResearch$xCorrupt practices
606   $aMedical scientists$xProfessional ethics
606   $aMedical research personnel$xProfessional ethics
606   $aBiotechnology$xResearch
610   $aPHILOSOPHY/Ethics & Bioethics
610   $aBIOMEDICAL SCIENCES/General
615  0$aMedicine$xResearch$xCorrupt practices.
615  0$aMedical scientists$xProfessional ethics.
615  0$aMedical research personnel$xProfessional ethics.
615  0$aBiotechnology$xResearch.
676   $a610.72/4
700   $aRedman$b Barbara Klug$01677773
801  0$bOCoLC-P
801  1$bOCoLC-P
906   $aBOOK
912   $a9910816431603321
996   $aResearch misconduct policy in biomedicine$94078210
997   $aUNINA