LEADER 04752nam 2200553 450 001 9910816421203321 005 20170919025057.0 010 $a1-4422-5919-1 035 $a(CKB)3710000000610916 035 $a(EBL)4439564 035 $a(MiAaPQ)EBC4439564 035 $a(EXLCZ)993710000000610916 100 $a20160329d2016 uy| 0 101 0 $aeng 135 $aur|n|---||||| 181 $2rdacontent 182 $2rdamedia 183 $2rdacarrier 200 10$aDefense acquisition trends, 2015 $eacquisition in the era of budgetary constraints /$fproject director, Andrew P. Hunter, project coordinator, Rhys McCormick, principal authors, Jesse Ellman [and three others], contributing authors, Kaitlyn Johnson, Gabriel Coll 210 1$aLanham :$cCSIS, Center for Strategic & International Studies :$cRowman & Littlefield,$d2016. 215 $a1 online resource (129 p.) 225 1 $aCSIS reports 300 $aA report of defense outlook: a CSIS series on strategy, budget, forces, and acquisition. 311 $a1-4422-5918-3 327 $aFigures; Tables; Executive Summary; What Is DoD Buying?; Birth of the Defense Innovation Initiative-Third Offset Strategy; A Five-Year Trough Has Developed in the Weapon Systems Pipeline; Services Contracts Surprisingly Resilient; How Is DoD Buying?; Major Acquisition Reform Efforts in 2015 Will Take Time to Deliver Results; Effective Competition Rates Are Steady, Despite Desire to Promote Competition; Contract Outcomes Can Be Examined Using Contract Data; Whom Is DoD Buying From?; Small Vendors Accounted for Their Largest-Ever Share of Defense Contracts in 2014 327 $aThe Big 5 Defense Vendors Are Winning a Declining Share of R&D Contract ObligationsThe Present and Future of Defense Industry Consolidation; DoD Starts with a Narrow But Sustained Base for Outreach to Silicon Valley; What Are the Defense Components Buying?; Service Acquisition Portfolios Are Shifting In Distinct Ways; Army; Navy; Air Force; 1. Introduction; 1.1. Report Organization; 1.2. DoD Contract Spending in a Budgetary Context; 2. What Is DoD Buying?; 2.1. Innovation, R&D, and Technological Superiority; 2.1.1. Defense Innovation Initiative-"Third Offset Strategy" 327 $a2.1.2. Defense Innovation Unit Experimental: Finding New Sources of Innovation2.1.3. Research and Development Contracting during the Budget Drawdown; 2.2. Defense Contract Obligations by Platform Portfolio; 2.3. Defense Contract Obligations by Budget Account; 2.3.1. Procurement; 2.3.2. Operations & Maintenance; 2.3.3. Research, Development, Test, and Evaluation; 3. How Is DoD Buying It?; 3.1. Reforming the Defense Acquisition System; 3.1.1. Better Buying Power; 3.1.2. 2016 National Defense Authorization Act; 3.2. Contract and Fee Type 327 $a3.3. Defense Contract Obligation by Rate of Effective Competition3.4. Contract Outcomes beyond the Headlines; 3.4.1. Terminations; 3.4.2. Change Orders; 4. Whom Is DoD Buying From?; 4.1. Changes in the Composition of the Defense Industrial Base; 4.1.1. Army; 4.1.2. Navy; 4.1.3. Air Force; 4.1.4. Defense Logistics Agency; 4.1.5. Products; 4.1.6. Services; 4.1.7. Research and Development; 4.2. The Present and Future Consolidation of Defense Industry; 4.2.1. Top Products Vendors; 4.2.2. Top Services Vendors; 4.2.3. Top Research and Development Vendors 327 $a4.3. Silicon Valley Participation in the Defense Industrial Base4.3.1. Narrow Silicon Valley Base; 4.3.2. Persistence in the Top Tier, Tumult Below; 4.3.3. Silicon Valley Avoids Drawdown and Budget Cap Cuts Thanks to HP; 4.3.4. Implications for the Future; 5. What Are the Defense Components Buying?; 5.1. Army; 5.2. Navy; 5.3. Air Force; 5.4. Defense Logistics Agency; 5.5. Missile Defense Agency; 5.6. Other DoD; 6. Conclusion; Appendix A: Methodology; About the Authors 330 $aThis study examines contracting trends at the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD). It relies on empirical analysis of DoD contracting transaction data from the open-source Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). 410 0$aCSIS report. 606 $aGovernment purchasing$zUnited States 607 $aUnited States$xArmed Forces$xProcurement 607 $aUnited States$xArmed Forces$xAppropriations and expenditures 607 $aUnited States$xMilitary policy 615 0$aGovernment purchasing 676 $a355.6/212 700 $aHunter$b Andrew$0896279 702 $aMcCormick$b Rhys 702 $aEllman$b Jesse 702 $aJohnson$b Kaitlyn 702 $aColl$b Gabriel 801 0$bMiAaPQ 801 1$bMiAaPQ 801 2$bMiAaPQ 906 $aBOOK 912 $a9910816421203321 996 $aDefense acquisition trends, 2015$93943165 997 $aUNINA